Why work is force times distance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chaitanya Gaur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the definition of work in physics as force times distance, questioning its alignment with the everyday meaning of "work." Participants note that this definition is useful for understanding energy conservation, as work done on a system translates to changes in kinetic or potential energy. The conversation also highlights the distinction between scientific terminology and common language, emphasizing that physics often repurposes familiar words in specific ways. Additionally, the complexities of applying this definition when forces vary or act at angles are acknowledged. Ultimately, the importance of grasping these concepts is underscored for a deeper understanding of physical principles.
  • #51
If the unmodified original language was a perfect fit with physics, the principles of physics would have been discovered by primitive mankind the first time a true sentence was formed.
 
  • Like
Likes Monsterboy, williswang and russ_watters
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
7b5574ecbd44062e06b602f3d248ee2fbe56d960533b07027046ef34f3dee407.gif
 

Attachments

  • 7b5574ecbd44062e06b602f3d248ee2fbe56d960533b07027046ef34f3dee407.gif
    7b5574ecbd44062e06b602f3d248ee2fbe56d960533b07027046ef34f3dee407.gif
    18.6 KB · Views: 526
  • Like
Likes beamie564, jtbell, Cathr and 8 others
  • #53
Aufbauwerk 2045 said:
It is not a good answer to simply dismiss the question by saying that's just the way it is, so "get over it." That is not an attitude that respects someone's desire to understand why a certain word is used. "Get over it" is not the attitude that promotes curiosity and digging more deeply into why things are the way they are.
Nobody else in this thread besides you ever said "Get over it". @phinds said "get used to it", meaning that giving ordinary words a specific technical meaning is a very common practice in all fields of science. So any student must get used to the fact that this will happen frequently and learn that in science you need to use the corresponding scientific definition and not the ordinary definition. His comment was instructive (and brief), not dismissive.

Since we are now digressing and having an argument about non-existent slights, it is past time to close this thread.
 
  • Like
Likes nasu, davenn, bhobba and 1 other person
Back
Top