What is the connection between Arctanh x and the logarithmic function?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter paulfr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent Log
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the mathematical relationship between the hyperbolic arctangent function, Arctanh x, and logarithmic expressions. Participants explore various formulations and derivations related to this connection, including Taylor series expansions and algebraic manipulations. The conversation also touches on related functions such as arcsinh and arccosh.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially expresses confusion about the expression for Arctanh x, suggesting it can be represented as (1/2) [ Log (1+x) - Log (1-x) ], but later corrects this to clarify it refers to the hyperbolic tangent.
  • Another participant challenges the initial formulation, stating it incorrectly reduces to ArcTan(x) = (1/2) Log(2) and proposes an alternative expression involving complex logarithms.
  • A different participant suggests a method to derive the connection using Taylor series expansions for both sides of the equation.
  • Further contributions involve algebraic manipulations of the hyperbolic tangent function to derive logarithmic expressions, with one participant noting the triviality of solving for variables in terms of others.
  • Participants express difficulty in proving the logarithmic expressions for arcsinh x and arccosh x, indicating a need for further exploration.
  • One participant mentions that the relationship is a direct consequence of Euler's Formula, although this point is not elaborated upon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the correct expression for Arctanh x, with multiple competing views and formulations presented. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the proofs and connections for arcsinh and arccosh.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the correctness of their formulations and proofs, and there are indications of missing assumptions in the derivations presented. The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with complex analysis and hyperbolic functions.

paulfr
Messages
193
Reaction score
3
I can not seem to figure out why Arctanh x [ Hyperbolic Arctan ]
can be expressed as

Arctanh x = (1/2) [ Log (1+x) - Log (1-x) ]

Note; I know the 1/2 means the expression is a square root
of the ratio of the 2 binomials and has been taken out with the Power Rule

Can anyone show me the connection ?
===================================================
Note the above has been corrected for errors from the original post
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't write it correctly. What you wrote reduces to ArcTan(x) = (1/2) Log(2), which is clearly not correct. I think the correct expression is:
\tan ^{-1}(x)=i \log \left(\sqrt{\frac{1-i x}{1+i x}}\right) = \frac{i}{2}\log \left(\frac{1-i x}{1+i x}\right) = \frac{i}{2} (\log (1-i x)-\log (1+i x))

As to why, the best way I know to show the equality is to expand both sides in a Taylor series. Both sides can be expressed as:
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)}
 
I think you mean:

\arctan(z)=\frac{i}{2}\log\frac{i+z}{i-z}

Then just let:

w=\frac{\sin(z)}{\cos(z)}

then expand sin and cos in their complex form then solve for z using just basic algebra.
 
Darn, I was hoping I could correct this before anyone read it.

Sorry
I meant to write arc HYPERBOLIC tangent
And I did write it incorrectly

Arctanh = 1/2 [ Log (1+x) - Log (1-x) ] = Log [Sqrt { (1+x) / (1 - x) } ]

Again please forgive my carelessness.

And thanks for any insight you can offer.
 
Last edited:
Well, we have:
y=tanh(x)=\frac{e^{x}-e^{-x}}{e^{x}+e^{-x}}=\frac{(e^{x})^{2}-1}{(e^{x})^{2}+1}\to{y}=\frac{u^{2}-1}{u^{2}+1}, u=e^{x}
Now, solve for u in terms of y (almost trivial), then solve for x in terms of y (also trivial).
 
Arildno
Thanks. That does lead directly to the Log expression.

The similar sequence to find the Log expresion for Arcsinh x and Arccosh x
is not so trivial though.
 
Sad to say I still can not show or prove this equation to be true.

How can one show that arcsinh x is expressible as this logarithm ?

Thanks for your help
 
Well, let:
y=\frac{e^{x}-e^{-x}}{2}
Rearranging, we get:
e^{2x}-2e^{x}y-1=0

Thus, we get:
e^{x}=\frac{2y\pm\sqrt{4y^{2}+4}}{2}=y+\sqrt{y^{2}+1}
since the other solution is negative (impossible solution for exponential with real exponent).

Take the logarithm of on both sides to find x=arsinh(y)
 
So it is a direct consequence of Euler's Formula
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
17K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K