What is the correct derivative of the integral S(from -x to x) e^(-(t)^2) dt?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter asdifnlg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the correct derivative of the integral from -x to x of the function e^(-t^2). Participants explore different interpretations of the problem and the application of the fundamental theorem of calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant claims the derivative is 2e^(-x^2), while their teacher suggests it is 4xe^(-x^2) or possibly a negative version of that.
  • Another participant agrees with the first claim, stating that the fundamental theorem of calculus supports the 2e^(-x^2) result, using the symmetry of the function.
  • Some participants question whether the problem was copied correctly, suggesting that if the bounds were x^2 instead of x, the teacher's answer might be correct.
  • There is a mention of the integral being always increasing, leading to the assumption that the derivative should always be positive, which challenges the teacher's proposed answer.
  • One participant acknowledges a mistake in recalling the problem and clarifies that if the bounds were positive and negative x^2, the answer would be 4xe^(-x^4).
  • Another participant reiterates that the original problem was stated correctly and defends the first participant's method and answer as correct.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the correct derivative, with some supporting the first participant's answer and others backing the teacher's response. No consensus is reached on the correct solution.

Contextual Notes

There are uncertainties regarding the exact wording of the problem and the implications of different bounds on the integral. The discussion also highlights the potential for confusion in applying the fundamental theorem of calculus.

asdifnlg
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
S will be my integral sign. Find the derivative of this:

S(from -x to x) e^(-(t)^2) dt

I found it to be 2e^(-x^2)
My teacher says it is 4xe^(-x^2), or maybe a negative in front of the 4 (I forgot), which is also what the math book she got it out of says.

I don't really agree with this solution.. Which is right? (I graphed it and it looked to be what I got for an answer, but I may have done something wrong) I got it counted wrong for a test and I tried to explain my way, but my teacher said it wasn't the right way :[ Another thing I thought was wrong with the books answer is that the integral is always increasing.. so wouldn't the derivative always be positive? (which would count the book's answer wrong because for a negative number for x, it says the function would be decreasing at that point)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the problem is exactly as you have stated it then you are correct, however if it were x2 in place of both "x"s then your teacher would be correct. So are you sure you copied the problem correctly?
 
I think your solution is correct, based on the fundamental theorem of calculus. Using the symmetry of the function, note that :

[tex]\int_0^x{e^{-t^2}}dt = \int_{-x}^0{e^{-t^2}}dt[/tex]

So essentially you're evaluating,

[tex]2\frac{d}{dx}\int_0^x{e^{-t^2}}dt[/tex]

which comes to [tex]2e^{-x^2}[/tex] by the F.T.C.
 
d_leet said:
If the problem is exactly as you have stated it then you are correct, however if it were x2 in place of both "x"s then your teacher would be correct. So are you sure you copied the problem correctly?

No. If the bounds were positive and neg. x^2, the answer would be [tex]4xe^{-x^4}[/tex].
 
Curious3141 said:
No. If the bounds were positive and neg. x^2, the answer would be [tex]4xe^{-x^4}[/tex].

Yes you're right, I'm sorry about that, I forgot about the x2 in the integral for some reason in an attempt to slightly justify the teacher's answer.
 
The way I wrote it is the exact way the problem was worded on the test. I thought my way was right, and the teacher said that it would equal, like curious said, 2 S(0 to x) e^(-t^2), but then he said to do the derivative of that, you would need to plug in the x for t, then take the derivative of the e^-x^2, or something like that, which I didn't really agree with.
 
asdifnlg said:
The way I wrote it is the exact way the problem was worded on the test. I thought my way was right, and the teacher said that it would equal, like curious said, 2 S(0 to x) e^(-t^2), but then he said to do the derivative of that, you would need to plug in the x for t, then take the derivative of the e^-x^2, or something like that, which I didn't really agree with.

And you rightfully shouldn't. Your method and answer were correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K