What is the Correct Electron Configuration for Fe(2+)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The correct electron configuration for Fe(2+) is 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d6, as electrons in transition metals lose 4s electrons before 3d electrons when forming ions. This is supported by the Aufbau principle, which, while generally applicable, has limitations for heavier elements. The configuration can also be influenced by external factors such as compound symmetry and field strength. For accurate predictions, utilizing quantum chemistry methods like restricted Hartree-Fock calculations is recommended.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electron configuration and the Aufbau principle
  • Familiarity with transition metals and their ionization processes
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics and electron interactions
  • Experience with quantum chemistry software packages
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Aufbau principle on heavier transition metals
  • Learn about restricted Hartree-Fock calculations in quantum chemistry
  • Explore the effects of electron-electron repulsion on orbital energies
  • Investigate the role of compound symmetry in determining electron configurations
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and researchers interested in transition metal chemistry and electron configurations, particularly in the context of quantum mechanics and computational chemistry.

yecko
Gold Member
Messages
275
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


Electron configuration of Fe(2+)

Homework Equations


spdf configuration

The Attempt at a Solution


1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d3 4s2

But from (https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1232420),
it says 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d6.
isn't electrons fill up 4s shell first, before filling up 3d shell, for more stable arrangement?
or have Cr structure of "4s1 3d5"?
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a can of worms. My bet is that the exact configuration can depend on external factors - that is, whether electrons are technically on s or d may depend on the compound, its symmetry and field strength. I would go with Ygg's rule of thumb, in general ground configuration and - in many cases - exact configuration of ions is a purely academic problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara
yecko said:
But from (https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1232420),
it says 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d6.
If you have access to quantum chemistry package I would suggest that you try restricted Hartree-Fock calculation. Usually it predicts the correct configuration (i.e. it yields the lowest single configuration energy) as that used as general rule of thumb.
 
This is such a good question, and the answer is not very simple. I am thinking that this is somewhat technical enough to not be in a homework section.

Aufbau principle is not very reliable (Edit: they only work for very light atoms). Combination of electron-nuclear interaction and electron-electron interaction, sometimes cause reverse in the orbital energies.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
91K
Replies
4
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
27K
Replies
4
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
23K
Replies
4
Views
2K