What is the Correct Electron Configuration for Fe(2+)?

AI Thread Summary
The correct electron configuration for Fe(2+) is debated, with common configurations being 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d6 or 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d3 4s2. Generally, when transition metals form ions, the 4s electrons are lost before the 3d electrons. The energy levels of electrons can vary due to electron-electron repulsion, making the application of the Aufbau principle less reliable for heavier elements. The exact configuration may also depend on external factors such as compound symmetry and field strength. Understanding these nuances in electron configurations can be complex and often requires advanced quantum chemistry methods for accurate predictions.
yecko
Gold Member
Messages
275
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


Electron configuration of Fe(2+)

Homework Equations


spdf configuration

The Attempt at a Solution


1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d3 4s2

But from (https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1232420),
it says 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d6.
isn't electrons fill up 4s shell first, before filling up 3d shell, for more stable arrangement?
or have Cr structure of "4s1 3d5"?
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As a rule of thumb, when transition metals form ions, the 4s electrons are lost first: https://www.chemguide.co.uk/atoms/properties/3d4sproblem.html

I'm not exactly sure why this is, but perhaps someone with a better knowledge of quantum mechanics could provide an explanation.
 
This is a can of worms. My bet is that the exact configuration can depend on external factors - that is, whether electrons are technically on s or d may depend on the compound, its symmetry and field strength. I would go with Ygg's rule of thumb, in general ground configuration and - in many cases - exact configuration of ions is a purely academic problem.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
yecko said:
But from (https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1232420),
it says 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d6.
If you have access to quantum chemistry package I would suggest that you try restricted Hartree-Fock calculation. Usually it predicts the correct configuration (i.e. it yields the lowest single configuration energy) as that used as general rule of thumb.
 
This is such a good question, and the answer is not very simple. I am thinking that this is somewhat technical enough to not be in a homework section.

Aufbau principle is not very reliable (Edit: they only work for very light atoms). Combination of electron-nuclear interaction and electron-electron interaction, sometimes cause reverse in the orbital energies.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top