What is the correct notation for integrating F(x)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter majin_andrew
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrating
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the correct notation for integrating a function F(x), particularly in the context of antiderivatives and repeated integrals. Participants explore various notational conventions and their implications in mathematical expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the standard notation for the integral of F(x) and discuss the implications of using different forms of notation for antiderivatives and repeated integrals.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the lack of standard notation for the integral of F(x) and suggested alternative approaches for expressing repeated integrals. There is an ongoing exploration of how to properly denote these integrals without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the notation for integrals can vary and that assumptions about the meaning of F(x) may not be universally understood. There is also mention of specific notations used in specialized texts, indicating a broader context of mathematical notation.

majin_andrew
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi, this isn't a homework question, I'm just curious about this.

I am wondering what the correct notation is for the integral of F(x).

For example,
integral of f''(x) = f'(x) + c
integral of f'(x) = f(x) + d
integral of f(x) = F(x) + e
integral of F(x) = ??

I feel silly for not knowing this. Is there a common notation that I am not aware of, or is it simply a case of letting F(x) = g''(x) (or whatever) and carrying on from there?

Thanks!
Andrew
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There isn't any standard notation for that. Even integral f(x)=F(x)+C isn't really standard. It's common to write that when you are being introduced to antiderivatives, but in general if you write 'F(x)' you should never assume someone will automatically know it's the integral of f(x).
 
Edit: Sorry had trouble with the equation editing
 
Okay thanks for that Dick. So if I would like to write the second integral of f(x), is it the proper notation to write it as [tex]\int{\int{f(x)d^2 x^2}[/tex] ?
 
majin_andrew said:
Okay thanks for that Dick. So if I would like to write the second integral of f(x), is it the proper notation to write it as [tex]\int{\int{f(x)d^2 x^2}[/tex] ?

Even the first integral should really be written [tex]F(x)=\int_a^x f(t)dt[/tex]. The x dependence is really in the limit not in the dummy integration variable. [tex]\int f(x) dx[/tex] is really pretty casual. And you are REALLY stretching the definition of casual with that notation. Seriously, you very seldom need a 'second antiderivative' of f(x). That's probably why there is no good notation. If you do need it then just write 'pick g(x) to be a function such that g''(x)=f(x)'. Something like that.
 
Ok, thanks for your help.
 
Although there are few cases where it is needed, the Jn notation is used frequently in texts on integral equations and D-n in texts on fractional calculus, each for repeated integration.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K