What is the Cost of Lifetime for an Exponentially Distributed Component?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the expected cost of a component's lifetime, which is modeled as an exponentially distributed random variable with a given parameter. The problem includes two scenarios: one with a constant cost per unit time and another with a variable cost that increases over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the integration of cost functions weighted by the probability density function of the exponential distribution. There are attempts to clarify the integration process and the meaning of "weighted by f(x)." Questions arise regarding the limits of integration and the correct formulation of the expected cost.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing attempts at solutions and checking each other's work. Some guidance has been offered regarding the integration process, but there is no explicit consensus on the final answers, as participants are still verifying their calculations and addressing earlier mistakes.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There is a noted confusion regarding the formulation of the cost function in the second scenario.

roadrunner
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



component has lifetime X that is exponentialy distibuted with parameter gamma.

a) if the cost per unit time is a constant, c, what is the expectec cost of its lifetime?
b) if c is not constant, and=c(1-.5e^(a*x) such that a<0. (aka it costs more over time) what is its cost inrespect to its lifetime?

Homework Equations



f(x)=gamma*e^(-gamma*x)
E(X)=1/gamma
Var(X)=1/gamma^2


The Attempt at a Solution




i thitnk its just

a) c/gamma
b) (c(1-.5e^(ax)))/gamma

but that seems to easy...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To find E[cost] you need to integrate the relevant unit cost (per unit time) weighted by f(x) over the entire domain of X.
 
what do you mean "weighted by f(x)"?

so integrate c...so cx

and integrate (c(1-.5e^(ax)))/gamma
which is cx-(.5/a)e^(ax)

where x is time

but don't know what to do now
 
Well, you didn't actually integrate "over the entire domain of X"! You found the anti-derivative which is not quite the same thing. For one thing, the "expected value" does not depend upon x. "Weighted by f(x)" means, here, "multiplied by f(x)" before you integrate which is apparently what you did. What is the entire domain of X?
 
since x is t then 0 to infinity?
 
f(x)=gamma*e^(-gamma*x)

so would i go

c*gamma*e^(-gamma*x)
and
(c(1-.5e^(ax)))/gamma* gamma*e^(-gamma*x)

and then integrate form x=0 to infinity?
 
Correct.
 
c*gamma*e^(-gamma*x)

becomes (-C*gamma^2)*e^(-gamma*x) from 0 to infin
so at x=infin that equals 0
at x=0, it is -c*gamma^2

so c*gamma^2 is my first answer?

and then (c(1-.5e^(ax)))/gamma* gamma*e^(-gamma*x)
becomes c(1-.5e^(ax)))*e^(-gamma*x)
so C(e^(-gamma*x)-e^(-gamma*x+ax))
which becomes Ce^(-gamma*x)-Ce^(-gamma*x+ax)
and again...Ce^(-gamma*x)-Ce^(x(a-gamma))
so integrating that i get

(-C/gamma)e^(-gamma*x)-(C/(a-gamma)e^(x(a-gamma))) from 0 to infin
again, at infin it equals 0
at 0, the first expression is -C/gamma and the 2nd is C/(a-gamma)
so that means 0-(-C/gamma -C/(a-gamma) )
so my answer is C/gamma +C/(a-gamma)?
 
just checked over my mtath and i did them wrong...the first answer is just C

and the 2nd would be C(1-(.5gamma/a-gamma)

NOTE i made a mistake real early...its (c(1-.5e^(ax))) not (c(1-.5e^(ax)))/gamma
and changed that for this above calc
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K