What is the D'Alembert operator

Click For Summary
The D'Alembert operator, denoted as \(\square\), is defined as \(\square = \left[-\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2} + \nabla^2 \right]\) in rectangular coordinates and is crucial in the wave equation. There is some variation in notation, with some authors using \(\square^2\) or an overall opposite sign. The operator can also include a wave speed factor, leading to the expression \(\square = \left[-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2} + \nabla^2 \right]\). This notation is largely a matter of preference, but it remains invariant as \(\square = \partial_\mu \partial^\mu\). Understanding these variations is essential for clarity in mathematical physics discussions.
SeReNiTy
Messages
170
Reaction score
0
I've seen two different textbooks write two different expressions for this, what is the proper D'Alembert Operator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the wave operator
\square = \left[-\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2} + \nabla^2 \right], written in rectangular coordinates, that appears in the wave-equation. Some write \square^2 and some write it with an overall opposite sign.

See "[URL .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
robphy said:
It's the wave operator
\square = \left[-\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2} + \nabla^2 \right], written in rectangular coordinates, that appears in the wave-equation. Some write \square^2 and some write it with an overall opposite sign.

See "[URL .

I write the sqaured version but with a 1/(c^2) factor in it, so the sqaured operator is the same as the unsqaured one?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oops, I left off the wave speed (which is sometimes absorbed into the variables for convenience)
\square = \left[-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2} + \nabla^2 \right]. Thanks for pointing that out.

Some write the wave equation
\left[-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2} + \nabla^2 \right] \phi=0
as
\square \phi=0, and some as \square^2 \phi=0. It's a notational thing.
 
Just as a side point, it's invariant since

\square = \partial_\mu \partial^\mu
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K