What is the damping factor of a cantilever beam in free air?

AI Thread Summary
The damping factor of a cantilever beam in free air is influenced by its size, shape, and clamping method, with even minor changes affecting the damping significantly. For experimental setups, direct measurement is the most reliable way to determine the damping factor. In theoretical analyses, a damping factor may be arbitrarily chosen to ensure numerical methods function properly, often around a Q value of 100. For a small cantilever beam measuring 14mm x 3mm x 0.2mm, a reference paper on nanoscale mechanical beam resonators may provide useful insights. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate frequency response analysis in such applications.
Oscar6330
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
As part of some research work, I am reading a research paper which has taken damping factor of a cantilever beam c=0.01kg/ ms. With no background in advanced physics, I cannot understand how this assumption has been made. If you could tell me what's the damping factor of a cantilever beam in free air, would really help me understand this concept. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's impossible to say, unless you can give a link to the paper online.

The damping factor will depend on the size and shape of the beam, and it can be VERY sensitive to the way the beam is clamped. (A tiny amount of oil or grease between the beam and the clamp can change the amount of damping by a factor of 10 times).

The best way to find the damping factor for an experimental setup is to measure it.

For a theoretical paper, the damping factor may not be very important, so they may have just picked a number that gives a small amount of damping (say a Q value of 100). Some numerical methods don't work very well if the damping level in the simulation is zero.
 
Is this an AFM cantilever?
 
The paper is titled "Transfer Function Analysis of the Micro Cantilever Used in Atomic Force Microscopy". I cannot upload it here because of IEEE copyright violation (I guess).

The paper discusses an AFM Cantilever. But what I need is a frequency response analysis of a small cantilever beam (dimension 14mm x 3 mm x 0.2mm). One end of cantilever is soldered to a pcb and is in free air. The above mentioned paper gives transfer functions for this analysis but uses damping factor. Currently my analysis is theoretical, so I what value can I assume? Thanks
 
For theoretical formulas, this paper may be useful:
Experimental measurement and model analysis of damping effect
in nanoscale mechanical beam resonators in air
J Applied Physics, author K. Yum

Look it up on Google Scholar.
Also look up papers by J.E.Sader in the same journal, around 1998.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top