What is the definition of a^i?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 3.14lwy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the definition of a^i, where a is a real number and i is the imaginary unit. It is established that a^i can be expressed as e^(i(log(a))) = cos(log(a)) + isin(log(a)), confirming that it remains a complex number. The conversation also touches on the proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra, noting its complexity and suggesting that a simpler proof is typically encountered in the study of complex functions at the junior college level. Additionally, it is confirmed that i^i equals e^(-pi/2), with the caveat that complex functions like ai are not single-valued. Overall, the thread explores the intricacies of complex exponentiation and related mathematical concepts.
3.14lwy
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
(1)

what is the definition of a^i ? (where a is a real number , i = (-1)^(1/2) )

is this still a complex number ?




(2)

where can I find the prove of "a n degree polynomial has n roots" ??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1) a^i =e^(i(log(a)))=cos(log(a)) + isin(log(a))

2) A proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra, first formulated by Gauss is very difficult. A simpler proof can be found by the time you get into the study of Complex Functions, generally a Junior college study.
 
thank you!

then , is i^i = e^[(i)*(pi/2)*(i)] = e^(-pi/2) ??
 
Yes, it is.
 
With the proviso that ai is, like most complex functions, not single valued.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top