What is the definition of lim sup and how is it related to subsequential limits?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alyafey22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Sequence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit superior (lim sup) of a sequence of real numbers \(s_n\) is defined as the supremum of the set of all subsequential limits \(E\) of \(s_n\) in the real extended line, expressed mathematically as \(\lim \text{sup } s_n = \text{sup } E\). This definition does not require proof, as it is a standard mathematical concept with multiple equivalent formulations. For further understanding, examples illustrating this concept are beneficial.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sequences and limits in real analysis
  • Familiarity with the concept of subsequential limits
  • Knowledge of supremum and infimum in the context of real numbers
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and terminology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the various definitions of limit superior in real analysis
  • Explore examples of sequences and their subsequential limits
  • Learn about the properties of supremum and infimum in mathematical analysis
  • Investigate equivalent formulations of lim sup and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis, as well as educators looking to clarify the concept of limit superior and subsequential limits.

alyafey22
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,556
Reaction score
2
Let $s_n$ be a sequence of real numbers and define $E$ to be the set of all subsequential limits of $s_n$ in the real extended line. Then we define the following

$$\lim \text{sup } s_n = \text{sup } E$$​

For some reason I don't quite understand the above formula , do we need to prove it ? It would be nice if you give some examples.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ZaidAlyafey said:
Let $s_n$ be a sequence of real numbers and define $E$ to be the set of all subsequential limits of $s_n$ in the real extended line. Then we define the following
$$\lim \text{sup } s_n = \text{sup } E$$​
For some reason I don't quite understand the above formula , do we need to prove it ? It would be nice if you give some examples.

We really don't prove a definition. There are many equivalent ways to define lim sup.
But there is no point in reinventing the wheel. Have a look at this page.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K