What is the derivative of 4x(16-x^2)^0.5?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tiiba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The derivative of the function 4x(16-x^2)0.5 is calculated using the product rule and chain rule, resulting in the expression 4((16-x^2)0.5) - (4x2)(16-x^2)-0.5. This derivative is crucial for solving the problem of determining the dimensions of the largest rectangle inscribed in a circle with a radius of 4, which ultimately leads to an area of 32 square units. The discussion emphasizes the importance of simplifying the derivative and finding the appropriate roots to derive the dimensions of the rectangle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically differentiation techniques
  • Familiarity with the product rule and chain rule in calculus
  • Knowledge of the Pythagorean theorem
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Practice differentiation using the product rule and chain rule with various functions
  • Explore optimization problems involving inscribed shapes in circles
  • Study the geometric properties of rectangles and squares inscribed in circles
  • Learn how to apply calculus to real-world problems involving area maximization
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematicians working on optimization problems, and educators teaching geometric applications of derivatives.

Tiiba
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I did this three times, and always come up with utter nonsense.

What is the derivative of 4x(16-x^2)^0.5?
(Root of (16 minus x-squared) by 4x.) What are its zilches? How did you calculate that?



This derivative is part of the solution to this problem: "What are the dimentions of the largest rectangle (by area) inscribable in a circle with radius 4?"

I drew the circle and the square (see attachment), divided the square into four parts, drew a diagonal through one, and called it a hypotenuse, which is equal to 4. X and y are the sides of the mini squares. A = 4xy (since there are 4 mini-squares). Then I used Pythagoras to come up with that equation above. But I can't differentiate it now...

The final answer is supposed to be 32 square units.
 

Attachments

  • galactica.gif
    galactica.gif
    1.6 KB · Views: 587
Physics news on Phys.org
you can differentiate it, just keep trying, or you could make your life easier: the maximizing the area is the same as maximizing the square of the area.
 
Tiiba said:
What is the derivative of 4x(16-x^2)^0.5?
(Root of (16 minus x-squared) by 4x.) What are its zilches? How did you calculate that?

Use the product rule and chain rule. I'll get you started:

(d/dx)(4x(16-x^2)^0.5)=4((16-x^2)^0.5)+(4x)(...

As for the zeros, the only important one is 2(2)^.5

Tiiba said:
This derivative is part of the solution to this problem: "What are the dimentions of the largest rectangle (by area) inscribable in a circle with radius 4?"

matt grime is right, it ends up being a square, but you should start with a rectangle to prove it to yourself.

Tiiba said:
I drew the circle and the square (see attachment), divided the square into four parts, drew a diagonal through one, and called it a hypotenuse, which is equal to 4. X and y are the sides of the mini squares. A = 4xy (since there are 4 mini-squares). Then I used Pythagoras to come up with that equation above. But I can't differentiate it now...

Sure you can, finish the above differentiation, simplify and then find a root that makes sense in this problem. Use the root to find y and then you'll know the area (which is, as you stated, 32 square units).

Good Luck,

Kevin
 
homology said:
(d/dx)(4x(16-x^2)^0.5)=4((16-x^2)^0.5)+(4x)(...
(d/dx)(4x(16-x^2)^0.5)=4((16-x^2)^0.5) - (4x^2)(16-x^2)^.5 =

-4x^2
-------------- + 4sqrt(16-x^2) = 0;
sqrt(16-x^2)

4x^2
-------------- = 4sqrt(16-x^2) = 0;
sqrt(16-x^2)

4x^2 = 4(16-x^2)

x^2 = 16 - x^2

0 = 16

BTW, this means x = sqrt(16-x^2), which is y.
So x=y, and if this is a square, that's perfectly true.

So there you have it: a full mathematical proof that 0=16.
 
Last edited:
Tiiba said:
(d/dx)(4x(16-x^2)^0.5)=4((16-x^2)^0.5) - (4x^2)(16-x^2)^.5 =

-4x^2
-------------- + 4sqrt(16-x^2) = 0;
sqrt(16-x^2)
The above is good

4x^2 = 4(16-x^2)

x^2 = 16 - x^2
This is bad. "add" x^2 to both sides to get 2(x^2)=16 which yields x=2sqrt(2) and not 0=16
So there you have it: a full mathematical proof that 0=16.
So there you have it: a full mathematical proof that you can't add
:biggrin:

Cheers,

Kevin
 
You needed calculus to prove THAT?

God, I'm sure glad I'm not studying arithmetic any more.
 
Last edited:
10 = 2 really
I mean:

102=210

1*2^1+0*2^0=2*10^0
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K