What is the determinant of a Lorentz transformation matrix?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vin300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant Matrix
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the determinant of Lorentz transformation matrices, specifically whether the determinant is always plus or minus one. Participants explore the generalization of Lorentz transformations, their relationship to rotations, and the implications of combining transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the determinant of a Lorentz transformation matrix is 1 but seeks to understand how to generalize this to ±1.
  • Another participant suggests that since Lorentz transformations can be classified as boosts or rotations, verifying that the determinant of a 3D rotation is ±1 is sufficient for the general case.
  • A different participant notes that reversing the space or time axis results in a matrix with determinant -1, supporting the claim that all Lorentz transformation matrices have determinants of ±1.
  • One participant poses a question regarding the proof of the matrix version of the relation involving the metric tensor and Lorentz transformation matrices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the determinant of Lorentz transformation matrices is ±1, but the discussion includes varying approaches and proofs, indicating some unresolved aspects regarding the generalization and specific cases.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the nature of Lorentz transformations and the conditions under which the determinant is evaluated may be implicit. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps necessary to prove the general case.

vin300
Messages
602
Reaction score
4
I have been asked to prove that the determinant of any matrix representing a Lorentz transformation is plus or minus 1. I can see that the determinant of the Lorentz transformation matrix is 1, but don't know how to prove +-1 in general. How to generalise the lorentz transformation? I've also read that rotations in the spatial planes also constitute L.T., that any transformation that keeps the metric invariant is an L.T.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since any arbitrary LT is either a boost between timelike and spacelike directions, a rotation between spacelike directions, or a combination of the two, I think all you need is to check that the determinant of a 3D rotation is [itex]\pm 1[/itex]. After that, if [itex]\underline L \underline R[/itex] both represent LT's, then what do you know about

[tex]\det (\underline L \underline R) = ?[/tex]
 
Reversal of the space or time axis produces a matrix of determinant -1. That proves that any LT matrix has determinant [itex]\pm 1[/itex]. det(LR)=det(L)det(R), so again, the resulting matrix has determinant [itex]\pm 1[/itex].
 
Last edited:
How to prove that the matrix version of ηa'b'= Ama'Anb'ηmn is η= ATηA, where A is an LT matrix?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 120 ·
5
Replies
120
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 89 ·
3
Replies
89
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K