What Is the Difference Between Theorists and Phenomenologists in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Schreiberdk
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between theorists and phenomenologists in the context of physics. Phenomenology focuses on observable phenomena, often involving simulations and computational techniques to predict experimental outcomes, such as those at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). This role acts as a bridge between experimentalists and theorists, utilizing tools like Monte Carlo simulations. In contrast, theorists concentrate on developing and refining theoretical models, engaging more with analytical methods and mathematics rather than direct experimentation. Both roles may involve programming, but their core activities differ significantly in focus and methodology.
Schreiberdk
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Hi there PF.

Im not sure if this is the right place for posting this question, but what is the difference between theorists and phenomenologist? What do each do, and where do they differ in work?

Schreiber
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey, I haven't read any of the rules and regulations of this forum so I hope that I don't get banned, but as far as I know (just after reading wikipedia on phenomenology), phenomenology deals with phenomena, I.E. things that are observable.
Theoretical physics may be more concerned with nuomena rather than phenomena (please refer to the second definition of noumenon in the link within this bracket space if you are unfamiliar with meaning of noumena http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/noumena ).

I am only an undergrad in physics so don't take my word for it lol.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology_(particle_physics) is a link to one of the hyperlinked pages when i searched for "phenomenology" which may be linked to theoretical physics (and your question).
For the full list, which as far as I can tell only has 3 links pertaining to your question visit " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology "
 
On a more pragmatic note:

Phenomenology: you'll prob end up doing lots of c++ coding, perhaps using Monte-Carlo type techniques to try and simulate particle collision events using event generators (cf Pythia, Herwig, Pomwig etc). The way I see it, particle phenomenology is the middle ground between an experimentalist and a theorist. These are the people that try to predict what might be observed at the LHC say, what to look out for etc, lots of computer simulation code, and so forth.

Theorist: actually investigating the theoretical models themselves rather than using them so much, if that makes sense. Trying to change or improve upon these theories (albeit in a very small way). Can involve lots of programming too, depending on what area of research you're in, but often much more pen and paper and analytics/mathematics.
 
Hello, I graduated from undergrad a few years ago with a Major in Physics and minor in Electrical Engineering. I tried to get experience working on and testing circuits through my professor who studied Neutrinos, however covid caused the opportunity to go away and I graduated with no experience or internships. I have attempted to break into the engineering industry with no success. Right now I am considering going for a Masters in Electrical Engineering and I need advice on if this would be...
I don't know if anyone on here works for any of the well known defense companies of your country, whichever country you are from?? Also, if you choose to work in one, do you think the engineering education provide from your school would adequately prepare you for the job. What do I mean by that? Well if you work at say Lockheed Martin and you work in the latest iteration of a missile or if you work at Pratt & Whitney, they assign you to work in the team helping out with building the jet...
Back
Top