What is the electric field at a point along the z-axis above a charged dome?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the electric field at a point along the z-axis above a charged dome. The original poster attempts to apply Gauss's law using a cylindrical Gaussian surface to analyze the electric field, but encounters difficulties with the integration and the resulting complex number.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants inquire about the specifics of the cylindrical Gaussian surface, including its dimensions and the implications of field lines passing through it. There are suggestions to reconsider the shape of the Gaussian surface, with some proposing a dome-like geometry instead.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different geometrical interpretations of the Gaussian surface. Some guidance has been offered regarding the limitations of the cylindrical surface, and there is a suggestion to visualize the field lines more accurately.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of field lines that extend infinitely and how they interact with the chosen Gaussian surface. There is also a consideration of the charge distribution and the role of image charges in the problem setup.

math4everyone
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


rOgE8.png

cSlqo.png


Homework Equations


The z component of the field:

$$E_z = \frac{-Qh}{2\pi\varepsilon_0 (r^2+h^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to choose a cylinder for my Gaussian surface such that the radius of it matches with the distance d I am trying to find and its height is such that all field lines are within the interior of the cylinder.
I know that the electric field in the z component in this case is:
\begin{equation}
\frac{-Qh}{2 \pi \varepsilon_o (r^2+h^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}
\end{equation}
Thus, if I integrate:
\begin{equation}
\int \frac{-Qh}{2 \pi \varepsilon_o (r^2+h^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}dA=\int_0^d \frac{-Qh(2 \pi r dr)}{2 \pi \varepsilon_o (r^2+h^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}=\int_0^d \frac{-Qh(r dr)}{\varepsilon_o (r^2+h^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}=\frac{Q}{\varepsilon_o}
\end{equation}
So:
\begin{equation}
\int_0^d \frac{r dr}{(r^2+h^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}=-\frac{1}{h}
\end{equation}
And this is ultimately:
\begin{equation}
\frac{1}{h}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{h^2+d^2}}=-\frac{1}{h}
\end{equation}
However, if a solve for d, it yields a complex number
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.

Can you please describe in more detail your cylindrical Gaussian surface? Where are the locations of the top and bottom of the cylinder?

I believe you will need to consider a different shape of Gaussian surface for this problem.
 
TSny said:
Hello.

Can you please describe in more detail your cylindrical Gaussian surface? Where are the locations of the top and bottom of the cylinder?

I believe you will need to consider a different shape of Gaussian surface for this problem.
Hello, I tried to do something like this
http://imageshack.com/a/img921/9379/gQAcim.png
I also thought of doing something with the image charge
http://imageshack.com/a/img924/2415/9XBrlC.png
However, I am not sure what is the charge enclosed in this sphere...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you included more electric field lines in your drawing (coming out of the upper part of the point charge), wouldn't some of those field lines go through the flat top of your cylindrical Gaussian surface, and also wouldn't some of the field lines go through the vertical (curved) side of the cylindrical surface? Thus, there would be some flux through your Gaussian surface that you have not accounted for.

Also, how does your picture account for the fact that you are interested in the field lines that leave the point charge in a horizontal direction?
 
TSny said:
If you included more electric field lines in your drawing (coming out of the upper part of the point charge), wouldn't some of those field lines go through the flat top of your cylindrical Gaussian surface, and also wouldn't some of the field lines go through the vertical (curved) side of the cylindrical surface? Thus, there would be some flux through your Gaussian surface that you have not accounted for.

Also, how does your picture account for the fact that you are interested in the field lines that leave the point charge in a horizontal direction?
I don't know. What I thought was that I can make the height of the cylinder even larger in order to cover those field lines you mention because it doesn't affect the result. And the horizontal field line starts bending in the instant it is coming out the charge, so... I really don't know.
 
There will always be some field lines that go higher than any finite height you choose for the top surface of your cylinder. The field line that leaves the point charge vertically upward will go vertically upward to infinity. Those that leave the charge almost vertically upward will go very far upward before curving back down and meeting the plane very far away from r = 0. If your cylinder has a finite radius, d, then some of the field lines will pass through the vertical side of the cylinder. So, a cylindrical shape Gaussian surface doesn't appear to be very appropriate for this problem.

Since you are interested in field lines that leave the point charge horizontally, try to picture all of the field lines that leave the charge horizontally. Can you describe roughly the geometrical shape of the surface formed by all of these lines?
 
TSny said:
There will always be some field lines that go higher than any finite height you choose for the top surface of your cylinder. The field line that leaves the point charge vertically upward will go vertically upward to infinity. Those that leave the charge almost vertically upward will go very far upward before curving back down and meeting the plane very far away from r = 0. If your cylinder has a finite radius, d, then some of the field lines will pass through the vertical side of the cylinder. So, a cylindrical shape Gaussian surface doesn't appear to be very appropriate for this problem.

Since you are interested in field lines that leave the point charge horizontally, try to picture all of the field lines that leave the charge horizontally. Can you describe roughly the geometrical shape of the surface formed by all of these lines?
Could it be a paraboloid?
 
Probably not a paraboloid, but it will be some sort of "dome". Can you use that dome surface as part of a closed Gaussian surface?
 
TSny said:
Probably not a paraboloid, but it will be some sort of "dome". Can you use that dome surface as part of a closed Gaussian surface?
Well, since the field lines with the image charge resembles ellipses, I could guess that it could be half part of an ellipsoid...
 
  • #10
The exact shape (paraboloid, ellipsoid, etc.) of the dome doesn't matter. Try to use the dome to your advantage.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K