What is the Energy Produced by a 55 Gallon Barrel of Air at 500ft Depth?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the potential energy of a 55-gallon barrel filled with air at a depth of 500 feet. Participants explore the use of formulas related to horsepower and displacement, emphasizing the importance of understanding force and distance in relation to work done. The compressibility of water is deemed negligible for this scenario, allowing for a focus on the upward force exerted by the water column. An example is provided to illustrate the dynamics of the barrel's ascent, with a pressure of approximately 86,000 PSI acting on it. The conversation aims to clarify the physics involved in this theoretical scenario for educational purposes.
SimpleQuery
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

This is not homework, just theory discussion with my son.
My son has been asking some interesting questions with regard to displacement as it relates to water. All kinds of teenager, “what if” stuff. I have looked around for simple formulas, but I am not embarrassed to say, I do not know how to use them. I am just a simple machinist, with simple questions.

Can some one or a couple of people help us learn to use these formulas and what formulas we should be using?

For example:
P(HP) = M(Min) HG/33000 (1)

I know what each item stands for (I think) but I need an example of the formula executed with basic numbers so I can then use it.

P(HP) = Horsepower
M(Min) = Mass flow rate per minute
H= Head in ft (I think)
G= Acceleration of gravity or 32ft per sec squared.

This seems to me like a falling water equation of some type which I want to get data from.

The question, in basic terms, that we would like to know is: How much potential or stored energy (in watts/hp/) would a 55gal barrel full of air have if it was tethered to the sea floor at a depth of 500ft? It seems like a non liner question. As the displacement of water column pushed the barrel upward the water column pressure would be reduced as the column got shorter on it assent, correct?


Thanks for helping us have fun with physics,
SQ
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Via archemedes principle, displacement is not about pressure, it is about volume/mass displaced. So the only reason this problem becomes nonlinear is the compressibility of water - which is so low that you can safely ignore it. From there on out, you have a force and a distance...
 
Thank you so much for your feedback.

I certainly agree that the compressibility of water is a non issue for this discussion. So you're suggesting using force and distance to represent work?

Just so we're on the same page please permit the following example: the 55 gallon drum full of air sits in a tube with approximately the same inside diameter as the outside diameter of the barrel. The tube has been evacuated of water in the barrel is sealed in the tube similar in some regards to a piston with in a cylinder wall. The tube is just a theoretical guide. So in basic terms there would be approximately 86K PSI pushing up on the drum. Please take the example from the point and help us figure out how much energy would be involved when the barrel tether was released from the drum and it started its ascent to the surface as the surrounding water filled the column by rushing in behind the barrel and pushing it upward.

Thanks,
SQ
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top