What is the equation for standing wave patterns and why is the solution 0?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the equation for standing wave patterns, specifically in the context of a viola. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the implications of obtaining a value of zero from the equation, particularly at certain points along the string.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the standing wave equation and its implications, questioning whether their interpretation of the variables is correct. Some participants clarify the meaning of the equation and the significance of obtaining zero at specific points, such as nodal points.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the meaning of the results derived from the standing wave equation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the equation and the nature of nodal points, but there is no explicit consensus on the original poster's understanding of the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions that they are researching a topic not yet covered in their studies, which may contribute to their confusion regarding the application of the equation and the variables used.

Tohoshi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi everyone. I am working on a physics research paper on Standing Wave Patterns and the physics of a viola. I found this formula for standing wave patterns and am having trouble making sense of it. When I tried, I got sin(0) which is 0 making the whole thing 0. Is this a valid equation and am I missing something?

w = 2764
t = (1/440)

k = 2pi/wavelength
x = distance traveled.

I am sorry, but I am really confuesed

Homework Equations



y = 2yocos(wt)sin(Kx)



The Attempt at a Solution



2yo (2764)(1/440) = 2p1
cos 2 pi = 1
sin (0) = 0

= Ahh!

I may be using the variables wrong, but I used 2pi * frequency to get w, 1/frequency to get t
 
Physics news on Phys.org
y(x,t) = 2yocos(wt)sin(Kx) is the function which is dependent on both time and position. t is not the period.

It's perfectly reasonable to get 0 a nodal points.
 
I don't know the formula y = 2yocos(wt)sin(Kx) so perhaps I shouldn't be offering any help.
But it seems clear to me that the sin(kx) = 0 at x = 0 is just telling you that there is no vertical movement of the string at x = 0. That would be the position where the string is attached. It seems a very reasonable result!
 
Okay. Thanks.

Excuse my ignorance, we had to research a topic that we haven't covered, but would it be more appropriate to use x as the string length, since that is further from where the string is attached and would cause vertical movement? I am not really understanding what I proved by getting 0...well I don't really understand what I am proving anyway.
 
The equation you listed is modeling a string in two dimensions that is time dependent. So you can think of the function giving you the height of the string at some distance x, and some time t.

x and t are variables that change.

You proved that when sin(kx) = 0 then the height of the string is also 0. This makes sense since at x=0 there is a node.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K