What is the exact definition of an octahedral hole in an ionic solid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ionic bonds
AI Thread Summary
An octahedral hole in an ionic solid is defined as a gap surrounded by six atoms arranged at the corners of an octahedron. In the context of structures like sodium chloride, octahedral holes are formed between layers of anions, allowing cations to fit into these spaces. The confusion arises when considering additional layers, as it may seem that more atoms surround the hole than defined by the initial concept. However, the definition holds that each octahedral hole is distinct and not influenced by atoms in layers above or below. Ultimately, understanding the arrangement of atoms in these structures clarifies the nature of octahedral holes in ionic solids.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
TL;DR Summary
I'd like to understand what a general and precise definition of an octahedral hole is when considering ionic close-pack structures.
I'm reading the book "Chemical Principles" by Atkins. In chapter 3H.6, entitled "Solids", there is a section that discusses a bonding model that explains structures and properties of many metals: the close-packed structure, in which spheres representing cations stack together with the least waste of space, "like oranges in a display".

We build up a close-packed structure in layers. Here are the first two layers:

1691165959266.png


The third layer can be added in two different ways because there are two types of dips between the green spheres of the second layer: one type lies over the spheres of the first layer and the other type lies over the gaps in the first layer.

In the first case, the third layer duplicates the first layer and by adding successive layers we get an ABABAB... pattern called a hexagonal close-packed structure (hcp).
1691166112867.png


In the second case we end up with an ABCABCABC... pattern called a cubic close-packed structure (ccp).
1691166130590.png

Then the text says that we can classify each type of dip as either a tetrahedral hole or an octahedral hole.

If a dip between three atoms is directly covered by another atom, the result is a tetrahedral hole. If a dip in a layer coincides with a dip in the next layer we have an octahedral hole, as we can see below

1691166218248.png

The tetrahedral hole is said to be formed by four atoms in the corners of a tetrahedron, and an octahedral hole is said to be formed by six atoms at the corners of an octahedron.

Now, the issue kind of starts with this last point. If we imagine a layer above the layer depicted above, then the octahedral hold would seemingly have nine atoms around it, since this third layer is no different from the first layer.

The issue for me really starts when we consider these holes in the context of ionic solids, e.g. sodium chloride.

Says the book,

The rock-salt structure is a common ionic structure that takes its name from the mineral form of sodium chloride. In it, the ##Cl^-## ions lie at the corners and in the centers of the faces of a cube, forming a face-centered cube (FIG. 3H.28). This arrangement is like an expanded ccp arrangement: the expansion keeps the anions out of contact with one another, thereby reducing their repulsion, and opens up holes that are big enough to accommodate the ##Na^+## ions. These ions fit into the octahedral holes between the ##Cl^-## ions. There is one octahedral hole for each anion in the close-packed array, and so all the octahedral holes are occupied. If you look carefully at the structure, you can see that each anion is surrounded by six cations and each cation is surrounded by six anions.

Here is a depiction of the rock-salt structure

1691166448923.png
1691166712405.png


As far as the initial definition of an octahedral hole goes, I don't see any octahedral holes.

According to the initial definition, I would say that a hole in this structure is "tetrahedral" in the sense that there is an atom directly below any dip, but now it would be pentahedral.

After all, the initial definition counted atoms in the layer where the dip occurs, plus atoms in one other layer (either above or below). But now three layers are being counted.

So I am confused.

My question is: what is the exact general definition of an octahedral hole?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You've given the definition of an octahedral hole and tetrahedral hole

"The tetrahedral hole is said to be formed by four atoms in the corners of a tetrahedron, and an octahedral hole is said to be formed by six atoms at the corners of an octahedron."

The holes are gaps between the two layers, and the number of atoms surrounding the hole defines what type of hole it is.

You've presented images that show the difference, that show the small gaps left in the layers. That show how placing the second layer can leave gaps, holes, with different numbers of atoms around the hole.

If you add a third layer, the same as the first layer, you have two octahedral holes, not one hole surrounded by nine atoms, because the third layer's atoms are not surrounding the hole between the first and second layer.In the case of NaCl, imagine the structure without the Na ions in place, just the Cl ions. The holes in the Cl layers then get occupied by the Na atoms.

I must admit, when I was first taught this in the distant past, I struggled with it too.
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost
"Now, the issue kind of starts with this last point. If we imagine a layer above the layer depicted above, then the octahedral hold would seemingly have nine atoms around it, since this third layer is no different from the first layer."
No, in line with DrJohns answer, let me say that you rather get a chanel of octahedral holes, each two adjacent holes sharing 3 neighbouring atoms of an A or B plane.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top