What is the expected value of x^2 for a wave packet in momentum representation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the expected value of x² for a wave packet in momentum representation, specifically defined by Φ(p)=N for -P/2=0 and

=0. However, the integral for diverges, indicating that the wave function does not decay sufficiently at infinity to yield a finite expectation value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Fourier transforms
  • Knowledge of expectation values in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of wave packet representation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Fourier transforms of rectangular functions
  • Learn about the implications of wave function decay on expectation values
  • Explore the concept of normalization in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the mathematical treatment of divergent integrals in quantum physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists analyzing wave packets, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of expectation values in quantum systems.

rgalvao
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


My teacher made up this question, but I think there's something wrong.

Consider the wave packet in momentum representation defined by Φ(p)=N if -P/2<p<P/2 and Φ(p)=0 at any other point. Determine Ψ(x) and uncertainties Δp and Δx.

Homework Equations


Fourier trick and stuff...

The Attempt at a Solution


I found Ψ(x)=(2ħN/x√2πħ)sin(Px/2ħ), where N=±√1/P
<x>=0, <p>=0, <p^2>=(P^2)/12

But when I try to calculate <x^2>, I get a strange integral, which goes to infinity. Am I doing anything wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello rgalvao, welcome to PF :smile: !

I see you didn't get a reply yet, so perhaps I can put in my five cents:

Your wave function ##sin x\over x## is the Fourier transform of a rectangular function and you can indeed see that ##\int \Psi^* \,x \, \Psi dx ## yields zero, but ##\int \Psi^* \, x^2 \, \Psi dx ## diverges.

I don't see anything wrong with what you do. The wave function simply doesn't fall off fast enough with |x| to give a finite expectation value for x2.
Let us know if you or teacher finds otherwise (i.e. correct me if I am wrong ... :wink: ) !
 
I'm not even sure about <x>. Sure, you can argue with symmetry, but the integral is not well-defined.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K