What is the explanation for 2(xo)(yo) = 2?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 2K views
TheKracken
Messages
355
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



we had a a function on a graph of f(x)=1/x and then we are suposed to find the area of a triangle where the tangent line is the hypontenuse, and the x and y-axis are the base and height...i found f'(x)= -1/x^2
from here i used the formula y-yo=x0(x-x0) and got that the x intercept is 2xo and then got the y intercept to be 2yo which means those are the lengths of the base and the height, from there you use the formula of a triangle and that is (2)(2)(xo)(yo) all over 2 and then i canceled out the 2's and got 2(xo)(yo) as the area of the triangle...and this all is correct...but how the heck does the also = 2? apperantly 2(Xo)(Yo)=2...could someone please explain this, possibly just some basic algebra rule and I'm having a brain fart?



by the way, this is off of MIT's OCW...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheKracken said:

Homework Statement



we had a a function on a graph of f(x)=1/x and then we are suposed to find the area of a triangle where the tangent line is the hypontenuse, and the x and y-axis are the base and height...i found f'(x)= -1/x^2
from here i used the formula y-yo=x0(x-x0) and got that the x intercept is 2xo and then got the y intercept to be 2yo which means those are the lengths of the base and the height, from there you use the formula of a triangle and that is (2)(2)(xo)(yo) all over 2 and then i canceled out the 2's and got 2(xo)(yo) as the area of the triangle...and this all is correct...but how the heck does the also = 2? apperantly 2(Xo)(Yo)=2...could someone please explain this, possibly just some basic algebra rule and I'm having a brain fart?

by the way, this is off of MIT's OCW...
What is y0 in terms of x0 ?

After all, isn't y0 = f(x0) ?
 
SammyS said:
What is y0 in terms of x0 ?

After all, isn't y0 = f(x0) ?

yes...but I don't think that makes a difference...you still need some form of units don't you? because if the answer is 2...then its 2 what? 2 inches? 2 meters? I understood it all the way up until he said therefor it =2
 
So I wouldn't be wrong if I left the units then would I? Or is it best to cancle and simplify like that?
 
Last edited:
sorry, yes there was some typos...fixed
 
SammyS said:
Whatever the units for x, the area of the triangle will not have units. It's a pure number.

Alright...now that I am thinking about it I think I understand...its because the x's arnt labeled with a unit/number.