What Is the Explanation for the 2n(n+1) in the FP1 Mark Scheme?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobbricks
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around a specific step in a mark scheme related to a mathematical problem involving summation notation and polynomial expressions. Participants are trying to understand the derivation of the expression 2n(n+1) and its context within the problem, which appears to involve summing powers of integers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the meaning of terms in the summation, particularly the presence of both r and n in the expressions. There are questions about the interpretation of the summation limits and the treatment of constants within summations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the summation process and the handling of constants, while others are still grappling with the underlying concepts and seeking further clarification. There is a mix of understanding and confusion, with productive exchanges occurring around the derivation steps.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a specific homework problem and are referencing a mark scheme, which may impose certain expectations on their understanding of the material. There is a noted lack of explicit consensus on some points, indicating ongoing exploration of the topic.

bobbricks
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Can someone explain the second step in the mark scheme for 10ii? I don't understand where the 2n(n+1) and (n+1) comes from and what the meaning of having r and n terms is when they're both on the left hand side (I'm only used to seeing only r terms on the left hand side with the sigma sign)?

Paper: http://www.edexcel.com/migrationdoc...2000/June 2013 - QP/6667_01R_que_20130610.pdf
Mark scheme: http://www.edexcel.com/migrationdoc...2000/June 2013 - MS/6667_01R_msc_20130815.pdf

I wrote out the following:
[nΣr=0 (r²-2r+2n+1)] =[nΣr=1(r²-2r+2n+1)] +[0Σr=1(r²-2r+2n+1)]
which leads to (1/6) (n+1)(2n²-5n+12), which cannot be factorised further.
Then I thought, it could be [nΣr=0] (r²-2r+2n+1)] =[nΣr=1(r²-2r] +[0Σr=1(r²-2r]+2(n+1)+n which didn't work either, at which point I looked at the mark scheme.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I take it you accepted (otherwise check here)
$$\sum_{r=0}^n r^3 = {1\over 6} n(n+1)(2n+1) \ \ ;\ \ -2\sum_{r=0}^n r = -2{1\over 2} n(n+1)\ \ ;\ \ \sum_{r=0}^n (2n+1) = (n+1)(2n+1)$$The latter is rewritten as ##2n(n+1) + (n+1)##; then ##-n(n+1) + 2n(n+1) + (n+1) = (n+1)(n+1)##.

Factor out the ##{1\over 6}(n+1)## to get the ##{1\over 6}(n+1) \left \{ 2n^2+n \ + 6(n + 1) \right \}##

[edit] Can't check what went wrong with your "which leads to" unless you spell out how you obtained that.
 
BvU said:
I take it you accepted (otherwise check here)
$$\sum_{r=0}^n r^3 = {1\over 6} n(n+1)(2n+1) \ \ ;\ \ -2\sum_{r=0}^n r = -2{1\over 2} n(n+1)\ \ ;\ \ \sum_{r=0}^n (2n+1) = (n+1)(2n+1)$$The latter is rewritten as ##2n(n+1) + (n+1)##; then ##-n(n+1) + 2n(n+1) + (n+1) = (n+1)(n+1)##.

Factor out the ##{1\over 6}(n+1)## to get the ##{1\over 6}(n+1) \left \{ 2n^2+n \ + 6(n + 1) \right \}##

[edit] Can't check what went wrong with your "which leads to" unless you spell out how you obtained that.

That's the bit I don't understand- Why does the sum from r=0 to n of (2n+1)=(n+1)(2n+1)? -- I would've thought that [nΣr=0 (2n+1)] =[nΣr=0 (1)] +[nΣr=0(2n)] but then I'm not sure on what to do from there
 
You can take the (2n+1) out of the summation: ##\sum_{r=0}^n (2n+1) = (2n+1)\,\sum_{r=0}^n1## (the expression to be summed does not depend on ##r##!).
 
BvU said:
You can take the (2n+1) out of the summation: ##\sum_{r=0}^n (2n+1) = (2n+1)\,\sum_{r=0}^n1## (the expression to be summed does not depend on ##r##!).

So in order to find [nΣr=0 (2n+1)], would you have to do [nΣr=1(2n+1)]+[0Σr=1 (2n+1)] and I would've thought that would become [nΣr=0 (2n+1)]=[n(2n+1)]+[0(2n+1)]..?Also, how do you know (2n+1) is a constant?
 
You want to sum over r=0 to r = n. The only thing that changes from term to term is r.
Varying r doesn't change 2n+1

Terms are 2n+1, each and every one of them, for r=0 to r=n. So n+1 terms "2n+1". The sum is (n+1)(2n+1).
It is so evident, simple and so close in front of you that it might escape you for that reason only.

[edit] Tip: don't split sum r=0 to n in two unless you have a good reason.
 
BvU said:
You want to sum over r=0 to r = n. The only thing that changes from term to term is r.
Varying r doesn't change 2n+1

Terms are 2n+1, each and every one of them, for r=0 to r=n. So n+1 terms "2n+1". The sum is (n+1)(2n+1).
It is so evident, simple and so close in front of you that it might escape you for that reason only.

[edit] Tip: don't split sum r=0 to n in two unless you have a good reason.

Ah, I understand thanks :) ..I don't suppose you know where I could find more questions like this one just to see if I do truly know how to do it now since I don't have anything like this in my textbook, and have exams coming up.
 
Sorry, no. Not at home in that world.
And: good luck with the exams!
 
BvU said:
Sorry, no. Not at home in that world.
And: good luck with the exams!

Okay, thanks for the help though :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K