What is the Force Exerted by a Falling Rod on a Hinged Support?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force exerted by a falling rod on a hinged support while considering fluid dynamics. Participants analyze the torque created by the rod's motion and the pressure forces from the fluid beneath it, debating the application of Navier-Stokes equations in their calculations. The conversation highlights the need to balance forces and torques acting on the rod, particularly focusing on the relationship between the pressure force and the hinge reaction force. There is also consideration of whether to include gravity in the analysis, with a consensus leaning towards ignoring it for simplicity. Ultimately, the goal is to derive the hinge force based on the established torque balance and fluid pressure dynamics.
  • #31
For drag flow past a circular cylinder, the drag coefficient is nearly constant on the order of about 1.0 for Reynolds numbers on the order of about 1000 to 100,000. So, the drag force per unit length on the rod is $$f=\frac{1}{2}\rho v^2 D$$where D is the diameter and v is the velocity across the rod (the component of velocity normal to the rod). So $$f=k(\omega r)^2=k'r^2$$where r is the distance from the hinge. So, to a good approximation, Haruspex's exponent is 2. The moment of the drag force is $$M=FL\cos{\theta}=\int_0^L{k'r^3dr}=k'\frac{L^4}{4}$$So, $$k'=\frac{4F}{L^3}\cos{\theta}$$This means that the local normal force per unit length exerted by the fluid on the rod is:
$$f=\frac{4Fr^2}{L^3}\cos{\theta}$$So, what is the normal force that the fluid exerts on the rod?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
joshmccraney said:
hahaha yea I know. And I agree. So how would we proceed here? We balance these two torques but how will this help us resolve that force?
When you have found the total normal force on the rod from the fluid (as per Chet's post) you can similarly find the total torque from the fluid.
This gives you effectively three balance equations, two being the two dimensional balance of linear forces, and one from the balance of torques. That means you can find both components of the hinge reaction even without knowing the A factor in the force from the fluid.
As Chet says, n=2 is reasonable.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
haruspex said:
When you have found the total normal force on the rod from the fluid (as per Chet's post) you can similarly find the total torque from the fluid.
This gives you effectively three balance equations, two being the two dimensional balance of linear forces, and one from the balance of torques. That means you can find both components of the honge reaction even without knowing the A factor in the force from the fluid.
As Chet says, n=2 is reasonable.
I used the total torque to get the value of the constant k'. All he needs to do now is determine the total normal component of the fluid force.
 
  • #34
Chestermiller said:
I used the total torque to get the value of the constant k'. All he needs to do now is determine the total normal component of the fluid force.
Ah yes, I didn't read your post in enough detail. I think it's actually a bit simpler my way, to write out all the equations assuming the drag is at distance r from the hinge is Ar2. The A's cancel without ever having to determine it; in particular, the dependency on the angle.
 
  • #35
Chestermiller said:
This means that the local normal force per unit length exerted by the fluid on the rod is:
$$f=\frac{4Fr^2}{L^3}\cos{\theta}$$So, what is the normal force that the fluid exerts on the rod?
$$F_n=\frac{4Fr^3}{3L^3}\cos{\theta}$$ Thank you both for the input!
 
  • #36
joshmccraney said:
$$F_n=\frac{4Fr^3}{3L^3}\cos{\theta}$$ Thank you both for the input!
Good, except lose the r^3 and the L^3
 
  • #37
Chestermiller said:
The moment of the drag force is ##M=FL\cos{\theta}=\int_0^L{k'r^3dr}=k'\frac{L^4}{4}##
Question: Why is the upper limit of integration L? The drawing attached to post #16 shows the fluid extending only partially along the full length of the rod. Or is it just a drawing?
 
  • #38
kuruman said:
Question: Why is the upper limit of integration L? The drawing attached to post #16 shows the fluid extending only partially along the full length of the rod. Or is it just a drawing?
That's not how I interpreted the diagram. I don't know what the correct interpretation is. Josh?
 
  • #39
Yea, my drawing is imperfect. Fluid is coming out of the entire triangular region.
 
  • #40
joshmccraney said:
The initial question posed was asking what force the hinge exerts on the ground.
There is no mention of the ground in the OP. Have you stated the problem word-for-word as given?

Not that I think I can contribute anything here, but I just wanted to understand the statement of the problem. I can't make any sense out of it whatsoever.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
477
Replies
1
Views
992
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
961
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K