What is the formal definition of a limit?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathshead
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Format Limit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the formal definition of a limit in calculus, exploring its mathematical formulation and implications. Participants provide examples and alternative interpretations of the definition, including its application in proving limits.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests an explanation of the formal definition of a limit.
  • Another participant presents the formal definition involving epsilon and delta, illustrating it with an example of the limit of the function 5x - 3 as x approaches 1.
  • A later reply critiques the complexity of the epsilon-delta definition, suggesting a more intuitive understanding of limits as the ability to make function outputs arbitrarily close to the limit value by choosing values of x near the point of interest.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the clarity and utility of the epsilon-delta definition, with some favoring its rigor and others advocating for a more intuitive approach. No consensus is reached on which perspective is preferable.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the potential confusion surrounding the epsilon-delta definition and the varying interpretations of what it means for a limit to exist. Some assumptions about the audience's familiarity with mathematical notation and concepts are present.

mathshead
can someone explain what the formal difinition of a limit ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
n -> [oo] An < +/- [oo]
 
the limit as x tends to a of f(x) equals L if;

for every number epsilon (usually, can't find the symbol) > 0, there is a corresponding number [sig] > 0, such that for all x;

0 < |x-a| < [sig] ==> |f(x) - L| < epsilon.

Is the formal definition.
for example (easy one);
To show that the limit of 5x - 3 as x tends to 1 is actually 2;

so a = 1, L = 2 (since this is what it does appear to converge to). Need
0 < |x-1| < [sig] for any epsilon > 0.

f(x) is within epsilon of L ie. |f(x) - 2| < epsilon. So to find [sig] from this,

|(5x-3) - 2| = |5x - 5| < epsilon
5|x - 1| < epsilon
|x - 1| < epsilon / 5.

so [sig] = epsilon / 5

and from 0 < |x - 1| < [sig] = epsilon / 5,

|(5x - 3) - 2| = 5 |x - 1| < 5 (epsilon / 5) = epsilon.

Which proves that L = 2.

Alternatively find a good textbook :wink:
 
The limit definition looks rather convulated when stated in terms of epsilons and deltas. One good way of thinking about it is this:

Given any allowable magnitude of error (formally epsilon) from a value (the limit), there exists a range near c (the value x is approaching) for which the function's outputs ( f(x) ) will deviate from the limit no more than the given magnitude of error (epsilon).

The key here is that if the limit for f(x) at a particular point c exists (and hence the previous statement holds), then we are stating that we can get f(x) as close to L as we want. I can make it within .001 or .000001, ... anything (because for each error I present to it, the limit existing garuntees that i can find an interval of values for x symmetrically about c such that f(x) will be that close to L).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K