What is the formula 1/(dS/dE)>>0 and how does it apply?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The formula 1/(dS/dE) >> 0 relates to thermodynamics, specifically defining temperature (T) in terms of entropy (S) and energy (E). The equation indicates that temperature is significantly greater than absolute zero, confirming that entropy increases with energy in classical thermodynamics. However, in certain quantum systems, negative temperatures can occur, where entropy decreases with increasing energy, challenging traditional thermodynamic principles. This discussion clarifies the implications of the formula and the conditions under which negative temperatures may exist.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics principles
  • Familiarity with entropy and energy concepts
  • Knowledge of classical vs. quantum thermodynamics
  • Basic mathematical skills to interpret equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of negative absolute temperature in quantum systems
  • Study classical thermodynamics and its laws
  • Explore the relationship between entropy and energy in various systems
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of temperature from entropy
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, and entropy-related studies.

Shaun Harlow
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am only aware that the formula has to do with entropy/thermodynamics. I could really use the help on how it applies in physics and what the formula is really about.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Shaun Harlow said:
I am only aware that the formula has to do with entropy/thermodynamics. I could really use the help on how it applies in physics and what the formula is really about.

In that equation, S is the entropy and E is the energy. In thermodynamics, temperature can be defined as:

\frac{1}{T} = \frac{dS}{dE}

So your inequality just says T \gg 0. So the temperature is well above absolute zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
stevendaryl said:
In that equation, S is the entropy and E is the energy. In thermodynamics, temperature can be defined as:

\frac{1}{T} = \frac{dS}{dE}

So your inequality just says T \gg 0. So the temperature is well above absolute zero.

That definition of temperature assumes that entropy increases with energy (so T is always positive), which is true for classical thermodynamics, but for systems with a discrete number of states, it's possible for S to decrease with E, which leads to the bizarre notion of a negative absolute temperature.
 
So the inequality is saying that the temperature is above zero? If so, you talk of the "bizarre notion" of a negative absolute temperature that some people infer, but that is not possible correct?
 
Shaun Harlow said:
So the inequality is saying that the temperature is above zero? If so, you talk of the "bizarre notion" of a negative absolute temperature that some people infer, but that is not possible correct?

The symbol \gg means "much greater than". So the temperature isn't just positive, it's pretty high.

Negative temperatures are not possible in classical thermodynamics, but there are quantum systems where a negative temperature is possible. A negative temperature means that the entropy goes down instead of up when the system gets more energy.
 
stevendaryl said:
That definition of temperature assumes that entropy increases with energy (so T is always positive), which is true for classical thermodynamics, but for systems with a discrete number of states, it's possible for S to decrease with E, which leads to the bizarre notion of a negative absolute temperature.
stevendaryl said:
The symbol \gg means "much greater than". So the temperature isn't just positive, it's pretty high.

Negative temperatures are not possible in classical thermodynamics, but there are quantum systems where a negative temperature is possible. A negative temperature means that the entropy goes down instead of up when the system gets more energy.

Alright! Thank you so much you have helped me better understand this and even went deeper into the meaning without making it hard to understand. I really couldn't thank you enough :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K