What is the formula for calculating fringe width in an interference pattern?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating fringe width in an interference pattern, with the derived formula being fringe width = λD / (2μd). The conversation highlights the steps involved in deriving this formula, including the use of various equations related to interference in different media. Participants express a desire for a more straightforward solution to the multiple-choice question posed. Clarifications are made regarding the relationship between wavelength, slit separation, and the refractive index. Ultimately, the detailed explanation of the solution is acknowledged as clear and well-presented.
Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


upload_2017-12-23_9-50-55.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


upload_2017-12-23_9-35-1.png

When the system is in air

## d \sin {\theta} = n \lambda ## ...(1)

When the system is in water and slit separation is 2d,

## \mu 2d \sin {\theta} = n \lambda ## ...(2)

## \tan {\theta} = \frac y D ## ...( 3)

Taking d<<D, ## \tan {\theta} \approx \sin {\theta} ## ...(4)

## \frac { n \lambda }{ 2 \mu d} = \frac { y} D ## ...(5)

## y = \frac { n \lambda D }{ 2 \mu d} ## ...( 6)

Fringe width ## = \frac { \lambda D }{ 2 \mu d} ## ...(7)

Now, ## \frac { \lambda D}{ d} =s ## ...( 8)

Fringe width ## = \frac { s }{ 2 \mu } = \frac { 3s} 8 ##So, the correct option is (e).

Is this correct?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-23_9-35-1.png
    upload_2017-12-23_9-35-1.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 781
  • upload_2017-12-23_9-50-55.png
    upload_2017-12-23_9-50-55.png
    12.3 KB · Views: 836
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct. Nice work!
 
ehild said:
Correct. Nice work!
Is there any easier way to solve it?
Or one has to go through all of those steps for solving the above question.
 
Pushoam said:
Is there any easier way to solve it?
Or one has to go through all of those steps for solving the above question.
Was not it easy? You presented a nice solution, every step explained and clear.
 
  • Like
Likes Pushoam
ehild said:
Was not it easy? You presented a nice solution, every step explained and clear.
It was a multiple choice question. So, I was looking for a shorter way.
 
Pushoam said:
It was a multiple choice question. So, I was looking for a shorter way.
Most steps were explained during the class to you, so it was not needed to write down. You have the formula for the distance between nearest interference fringes, and it is proportional to lambda and inversely proportional to d. s' / s = λ'/λ d/d' The wavelength in a medium is the vacuum wavelength divided by the refractive index. So s'/s=(3/4) x (1/2 ).
 
  • Like
Likes Pushoam
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
13K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K