What is the frequency of the source in the given RLC circuit?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the frequency of an AC source in an RLC circuit, where the potential differences across the capacitor and inductor are both given as 24 V(rms). Participants are exploring the relationships between voltage, current, and reactance in the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using voltage equations to solve for frequency and express uncertainty about their algebraic manipulations. Questions arise regarding the complexity of the problem and whether the approach taken is appropriate.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the implications of the circuit being at resonance, while others are still grappling with the relationships between the components. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions made in the problem setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of having two unknowns (frequency and current) in the equations, which complicates the analysis. The discussion also touches on the implications of treating the circuit as if it contained only resistive elements.

Misaki
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the AC circuit shown, the potential difference across the capacitor and the resistor, V(BD), is 24 V(rms). Similarly, the potential difference across the inductor and the resistor, V(AC) is 24 V(rms). What is the frequency of the source?

http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/8039/lolkve.png

Homework Equations



V = sqrt(V(R)^2 + V(L)^2)
V = sqrt((I(rms)*R)^2 + (I(rms)*X(L))^2)

V = sqrt(V(R)^2 + V(C)^2)
V = sqrt((I(rms)*R)^2 + (I(rms)*X(C))^2)

X(L) = 2pi*f*L
X(C) = 1/(2pi*f*C)

The Attempt at a Solution



So, immediately I saw that I could use the two voltage equations above to solve for either I(rms) or f, since both are constants. I decided to solve for f, as it is what the question is asking for. I arbitrarily took the inductance equation and rearranged for I(rms).

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/7150/codecogseqn1s.gif
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/1027/codecogseqn2w.gif
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/8778/codecogseqn3.gif
http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/3735/codecogseqn9.gif

Plugging that into the other equation:

http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/7231/codecogseqn5x.gif

Simplified into:

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/7870/codecogseqn7.gif

http://img849.imageshack.us/img849/9776/codecogseqn8.gif

Essentially, I ended up with something like:

http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/2517/codecogseqn10.gif

It's at this point that I basically gave up. I plugged the equation into wolframalpha, got around 89 Hz, and decided that that was a reasonable number.

Now, my question is, did I approach the problem incorrectly? Or is this the right way to do it, and the numbers are ACTUALLY this complicated? Or did I just make an algebraic error somewhere? Any help would be appreciated.

There are 3 more questions, but I need the frequency in order to solve them. Once I have it, the other 3 questions can be easily solved.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Misaki said:

Homework Statement



In the AC circuit shown, the potential difference across the capacitor and the resistor, V(BD), is 24 V(rms). Similarly, the potential difference across the inductor and the resistor, V(AC) is 24 V(rms). What is the frequency of the source?

http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/8039/lolkve.png

Homework Equations



V = sqrt(V(R)^2 + V(L)^2)
V = sqrt((I(rms)*R)^2 + (I(rms)*X(L))^2)

V = sqrt(V(R)^2 + V(C)^2)
V = sqrt((I(rms)*R)^2 + (I(rms)*X(C))^2)

X(L) = 2pi*f*L
X(C) = 1/(2pi*f*C)

The Attempt at a Solution



So, immediately I saw that I could use the two voltage equations above to solve for either I(rms) or f, since both are constants. I decided to solve for f, as it is what the question is asking for. I arbitrarily took the inductance equation and rearranged for I(rms).

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/7150/codecogseqn1s.gif
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/1027/codecogseqn2w.gif
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/8778/codecogseqn3.gif
http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/3735/codecogseqn9.gif

Plugging that into the other equation:

http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/7231/codecogseqn5x.gif

Simplified into:

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/7870/codecogseqn7.gif

http://img849.imageshack.us/img849/9776/codecogseqn8.gif

Essentially, I ended up with something like:

http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/2517/codecogseqn10.gif

It's at this point that I basically gave up. I plugged the equation into wolframalpha, got around 89 Hz, and decided that that was a reasonable number.

Now, my question is, did I approach the problem incorrectly? Or is this the right way to do it, and the numbers are ACTUALLY this complicated? Or did I just make an algebraic error somewhere? Any help would be appreciated.

There are 3 more questions, but I need the frequency in order to solve them. Once I have it, the other 3 questions can be easily solved.

Hi Misaki. Welcome to Physics Forums.

Wow, you did a lot of "heavy lifting" for what could be a straight forward problem :smile:

If this problem had involved pure resistances (suppose there's an RC and and RL in place of the capacitor and inductor), and given the described potential differences, what would you have concluded about the values of RC and RL?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
gneill said:
Hi Misaki. Welcome to Physics Forums.

Wow, you did a lot of "heavy lifting" for what could be a straight forward problem :smile:

If this problem had involved pure resistances (suppose there's an RC and and RL in place of the capacitor and inductor), and given the described potential differences, what would you have concluded about the values of RC and RL?

Well, if they were pure resistances, and you're given the potential difference across them, you could just calculate an equivalent resistance and use that to solve for current, right? But since they aren't just pure resistances, and you're missing f (which is needed for ω), you have two missing variables instead of 1. Am I missing something here?
 
if they were pure resistances, what would you conclude about the values of RC and RL?
 
gneill said:
if they were pure resistances, what would you conclude about the values of RC and RL?

I thought about that for around 10 minutes, but I seriously don't know the answer.
 
Misaki said:
I thought about that for around 10 minutes, but I seriously don't know the answer.

Umm. If A+B = B+C, what's the relationship between A and C?
 
gneill said:
Umm. If A+B = B+C, what's the relationship between A and C?

OH.

Wow, I can't believe I didn't realize that.
So essentially, it's at resonance, right?
 
Last edited:
Misaki said:
OH.

Wow, I can't believe I didn't realize that.
So essentially, it's at resonance, right?

Huzzah! :biggrin: Yes!
 
gneill said:
Huzzah! :biggrin: Yes!

Thanks, haha. I feel really dumb now. At least I got the right answer with my approach. xD
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K