What is the general formula for gravity acting on an aircraft?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mikedamike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aircraft Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the general formula for gravity acting on an aircraft, exploring the implications of gravity in the context of flight, including the forces involved and the conditions under which they operate. The conversation touches on theoretical aspects, practical applications, and conceptual clarifications regarding gravity and lift.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the gravity acting on an aircraft is the same as that acting on any other object, quantified as approximately 9.80665 m/s².
  • Others argue that while gravity remains constant, the forces acting on an aircraft, such as lift, thrust, and drag, must be balanced for level flight.
  • A later reply questions the concept of inertial frames, noting that a pen dropped in an aircraft falls to the floor, prompting discussion on what is truly balanced in this scenario.
  • Some participants mention that buoyancy can be considered a fifth force acting on an aircraft, though it is often negligible except in certain flying machines.
  • One participant highlights that gravity varies slightly with altitude and location on Earth, noting that a plane at higher altitudes experiences slightly less gravity.
  • There is a discussion about the effects of the Earth's rotation and how it influences the lift required for aircraft flying in different directions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that gravity acts on an aircraft in the same way as on other objects, but there are multiple competing views regarding the implications of this gravity in the context of flight, particularly concerning the balance of forces and the effects of altitude and Earth's rotation. The discussion remains unresolved on some points, particularly regarding the nuances of inertial frames and the role of buoyancy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the effects of gravity can vary based on altitude and geographical location, and that the forces acting on an aircraft can be complex, influenced by various factors including speed and direction of flight. There are also mentions of local anomalies affecting gravitational measurements.

mikedamike
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
what is a general formula for the gravity acting on an aircraft ?

Thanks in advance

regards
mike
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just the same as normal. Now if you're wondering why it doesn't accelerate downwards, that's because of Bernoulli's Principle and fluid mechanics in the case of a gas under nonconstant pressure everywhere, which I don't have much experience in.
 
Thank you for reply.

so if iv got this correct the gravity acting on an aircraft would be the same as gravity acting on any other possible object ? which is 9.80665 m/s2 (32.1737 ft/s2)
 
mikedamike said:
Thank you for reply.

so if iv got this correct the gravity acting on an aircraft would be the same as gravity acting on any other possible object ? which is 9.80665 m/s2 (32.1737 ft/s2)

Absolutely. In this situation, the only difference between an aircraft and another object that needs to be considered is that some other force holds an aircraft aloft.
 
The force that keeps the aircraft aloft does not how ever make a change to the gravity acting on it ? it just remains to be 9.80665 m/s2 (32.1737 ft/s2) ?

Thank you for you help
 
mikedamike said:
The force that keeps the aircraft aloft does not how ever make a change to the gravity acting on it ? it just remains to be 9.80665 m/s2 (32.1737 ft/s2) ?

Thank you for you help

Correct. Gravity's approximately a constant MG near the surface of the Earth and approximately GmM/r^2 otherwise. (Note that general relativity does come into play a bit here, but Newton's Universal law of Gravitation is a good enough approximation here.)
 
mikedamike said:
The force that keeps the aircraft aloft does not how ever make a change to the gravity acting on it ? it just remains to be 9.80665 m/s2 (32.1737 ft/s2) ?

Thank you for you help

Yes. To be clear, the forces are in balance.

The 4 forces on a craft are gravity, lift, thrust and drag.

If the plane is in level flight, then the force of gravity is perfectly balanced by the force of lift.

And the force of gravity is the same everywhere near the surface of the Earth. (Depending on how high the craft can fly, and how accurate you want to be. :smile:)
 
thank you for your answers. I appreciate your help.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Yes. To be clear, the forces are in balance.

If the plane is in level flight, then the force of gravity is perfectly balanced by the force of lift.
hhhmmmm. But a pen dropped from my hand falls on the plane floor. Is the plane + passengers + everything on it an inertial frame?

This happens as if I climbed a 35000 ft tower and dropped a pen with acceleration=9.8 m/s2 roughly. What is really balanced here? Just curious.
 
  • #10
Neandethal00 said:
hhhmmmm. But a pen dropped from my hand falls on the plane floor. Is the plane + passengers + everything on it an inertial frame?
As long as the airplane is flying at a constant altitude, constant speed, yes, it an "inertial frame". The pen would fall from your hand to the floor accelerating at 9.8... m/s^2. (If the plane were accelerating upward [or downward] the pen would have acceleration equal to the sum of 9.8 and the vertical acceleration of the airplane.)

This happens as if I climbed a 35000 ft tower and dropped a pen with acceleration=9.8 m/s2 roughly. What is really balanced here? Just curious.
There is no "balancing" force on the pen- that's why it is accelerating downward. As far as you are concerned, the part of the tower you are standing on gives the balancing, upward, force that you feel as your "weight".
 
  • #11
there is a fifth force acting on a plane which usually can be ignored because it is insignificant but it does play a part in some flying machines...buoyancy.
 
  • #12
Emilyjoint said:
there is a fifth force acting on a plane which usually can be ignored because it is insignificant but it does play a part in some flying machines...buoyancy.
Particularly in lighter than air flying machines!
 
  • #13
I do believe that the buoyant force is covered under "lift". i.e. there are many kinds of lift.
 
  • #14
Mikedamike, you're quoting g to six places of decimals, so I assume you care about exactness here. A plane at ten kms up will experience 0.2% less gravity.
The Earth's's gravity actually varies quite a bit even at the surface. The poles are closer to the Earth's centre than is the equator, making gravity a little stronger there. If you weigh objects stationary relative to the Earth's surface then they will appear lighter at the equator also because of Earth's spin. There are also local anomalies caused by variations in density of rocks/water.
Also, a plane flying W to E is orbiting the Earth faster than the Earth is spinning. This means it needs more centripetal force to stay at constant altitude. The lift it needs is lessened by that amount. Conversely, a plane flying E to W needs a bit more lift.
 
  • #15
HallsofIvy said:
As long as the airplane is flying at a constant altitude, constant speed, yes, it an "inertial frame".
The plane could be climbing or descending at constant speed (no acceleration), and still be in an inertial frame.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
20K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K