What Is the Incident Angle for the First Null in a Diffraction Pattern?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the incident angle for the first null in a diffraction pattern created by a plane wave of 400-nm light passing through a 25-µm slit. The context is rooted in the study of single-slit diffraction and interference patterns.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relevant formula for single-slit interference, specifically referencing the condition involving sine and the relationship for minima. There is also clarification on the meaning of "null" in this context, with a focus on the first minima.

Discussion Status

The discussion is progressing with participants recalling relevant concepts and equations. Some guidance has been provided regarding the application of the Fraunhofer Single Slit Diffraction relationship, and there is an acknowledgment of the terminology used in the context of minima and maxima.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the terminology "null" and its relation to minima, which some participants are clarifying. The original poster expresses feeling lost at the beginning, indicating a need for foundational understanding.

sssddd
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
the question is A plane wave of 400-nm light is incident on a 25-µm slit in a screen, as shown in the figure below. At what incident angle will the first null of the diffraction pattern be on a line perpendicular to the screen?http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/9766/inter9ax.jpg

I really do not where to start. Please help me out, i am so lost.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, do you know the condition / formula for single slit interfence?
 
it's the one with the sin theta right or something right? please point me to the right track
 
I think this can be solved using the Fraunhofer Single Slit Diffraction relationship;

a\sin\theta = m\lambda

Where a is the size of the slit, \lambda is the wavelength and m is the order of the minima.
 
ok ok i think i am remembering this now, and m would be 1 right for first null. when they say null they mean the minima fully destructive right
 
sssddd said:
ok ok i think i am remembering this now, and m would be 1 right for first null. when they say null they mean the minima fully destructive right

I am assuming that's what null means a minima (I haven't heard that terminology for a while). Yes, the fist minima would be at m = 1. This is different to maximas where the first maxima is at n = 1.
 
ok thank you so much now i can find the angle easily
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K