What is the Integral Representation of Pi(x)?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eljose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral representation of Pi(x) is established through the equality Sum(p)f(p)=Int(1,∞)pi(x)f´(x), where f(x)=x^-s. This leads to the formulation Sum(p)p^-s=g(s)=-sInt(1,∞)Pi(x)x^-(s+1)dx. The discussion highlights that calculating Pi(x) requires knowing the integral with an accuracy of 0.1, and critiques the traditional approximation Pi(x)=x/ln(x) for its limitations. The proposed method offers an exact expression for Pi(x) and discusses computational challenges associated with evaluating the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus and complex analysis
  • Familiarity with the Riemann zeta function and its properties
  • Knowledge of Mellin transforms and their applications
  • Basic concepts of number theory, particularly prime number distribution
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of the Riemann zeta function and its relation to prime numbers
  • Study the application of Mellin transforms in number theory
  • Learn about numerical methods for evaluating complex integrals, including Monte Carlo integration
  • Investigate analytic continuation of functions and their implications in number theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and computational scientists interested in prime number theory and integral representations of mathematical functions.

  • #31
If you are going to make wild claims such as no one has ever written down a funtion defined on C such that values at integers are equal to the values of pi, then you ought at least to go away and check if that is true or not. I can think of many extensions to C.

As we keep pointing out, simply writing down a transformation isn't research. Do some work with it.

You may be an undiscovered genius, and if you keep going the way you are now that is how you'll stay. - insulting those whose approval you need isn't going to win you many supporters. You don't actually appear to want to learn any mathematics, or do any mathematics. Instead you seem content to write out elementary formulae that anyone could find. How about reading the papers of Selberg, Conrey, Odlyzko, Ono. Wiles, Green, Keating, et al to see what some real maths looks like? Then perhaps you can make a value judgement on your find.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
951
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
777
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K