What is the Jones Matrix of a mirror at an angle?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Jones Matrix for a mirror at normal incidence is represented as (1 0; 0 -1). To incorporate a non-zero angle of incidence, one should consider using Fresnel equations for reflection, which are applicable in linear and isotropic media without cross-talk between S and P polarizations. The discussion also highlights the importance of constructing a transformation matrix to convert |H> and |V> states into |P> and |S> states. A relevant paper detailing this analysis is available at http://www.mbl.edu/cdp/files/2012/07/oe_02_943.pdf.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Jones calculus
  • Familiarity with Fresnel equations for reflection
  • Knowledge of optical polarization states |H>, |V>, |P>, and |S>
  • Basic principles of linear and isotropic media
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Jones Matrix for non-zero angles of incidence
  • Research the application of Fresnel equations in optical systems
  • Explore transformation matrices for converting between polarization states
  • Read the detailed analysis in the paper linked: http://www.mbl.edu/cdp/files/2012/07/oe_02_943.pdf
USEFUL FOR

Optical engineers, physicists, and researchers working with optical polarization and reflection in various media will benefit from this discussion.

Corwin_S
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Hi,

Concerning optical polarization, what is the Jones Matrix of a mirror at a non-zero angle of incidence with respect to incoming light?

For a mirror at normal incidence the matrix is (1 0; 0 -1);
How do I incorporate the angle?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Corwin_S said:
Hi,

Concerning optical polarization, what is the Jones Matrix of a mirror at a non-zero angle of incidence with respect to incoming light?

For a mirror at normal incidence the matrix is (1 0; 0 -1);
How do I incorporate the angle?

Interesting question- I'm not sure the Jones calculus can handle this. Have you tried constructing a transformation matrix to convert the |H> and |V> states into |P> and |S> states?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Corwin_S
I think using Fresnel equations for reflection is sufficient if the system only involves linear and isotropic media, as in such a system, there are no cross-talks between the S and P polarizations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Corwin_S
blue_leaf77 said:
I think using Fresnel equations for reflection is sufficient if the system only involves linear and isotropic media, as in such a system, there are no cross-talks between the S and P polarizations.

That's what I meant, and you're right, everything needs to be well-behaved. I have derived the "maltese cross" pattern for high NA objectives using the Jones formalism by writing a Jones vector for a plane wave propagating along the optical axis using the |P> and |S> basis, the two components vary with azimuthal angle.

A good paper showing this type of analysis in detail is here: http://www.mbl.edu/cdp/files/2012/07/oe_02_943.pdf , and it should provide the OP with sufficient information.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Corwin_S
Thanks guys, I still been unable to actually construct the matrix, but this is quite adequate for the application.

Cheers
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K