What Is the Largest Order of an Element in S_{10}?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ElDavidas
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the largest order of an element in the symmetric group S10. Participants are exploring the relationship between the order of elements and the properties of permutations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the distinction between the order of a group and the order of an individual element. There is a discussion about the representation of permutations as products of disjoint cycles and how this relates to their orders.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the definitions and properties involved. Some guidance has been offered about the implications of group properties on element orders, but no consensus has been reached on the specific largest order in S10.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the importance of precise language and assumptions in mathematical questions, particularly regarding the relationship between group order and element order.

ElDavidas
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
I was in a tutorial today and was asked

"What is the largest order that an element of [tex]S_{10}[/tex] can have?"

I thought the answer was 10! but I've been told this is wrong. Can someone help me out with what's going on? I thought you calulated the order by the formula:

[tex]|S_n| = n![/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You were asked about the order of an element, not the order of the group.

There can't be an element of order 10! in S_10, because then S_10 would be abelian (even cyclic).

Do you know that any permutation can be written as the product of disjoint cycles?
 
I noticed that a lot of people can't answer these questions when asked.

The question that Muzza just asked is something you should know to answer the question you want to know.
 
Ahem, this seems that it is also a matter of English and presumption.

For the following question:

Let G be a group of order m, what is the largest order an element can have?

Then the correct answer really is m, since all elements have order dividing m and there is always a cyclic group of order m.

However, just because something can happen doesn't mean it does happen. If we're given the extra information that G is actually S_n and n!=m, then, we can get a *better* answer, and indeed we can explicitly say what all permissible orders of elements are.

Can is a bad word, in this question, or many questions. The better phrase would be: what is the largest order of an element of S_n.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K