High Energy What is the level of Aitchison & Hey's QFT books?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the two-volume set "Gauge Theories in Particle Physics" by Aitchison and Hey, comparing its complexity and content to other well-known textbooks like Griffiths, Thomson, Peskin & Schroeder, and Schwartz. It is noted that Aitchison & Hey may present a higher level of difficulty than Griffiths or Thomson. However, they are considered to be roughly equivalent to Peskin & Schroeder and Schwartz in terms of academic rigor. The choice of textbook ultimately depends on the specific needs and preferences of the student, as each text offers valuable insights into field theory. Key topics that might be missed when opting for Aitchison & Hey over Peskin & Schroeder are subjective and vary based on the student's focus in the field.
particlesandpoems
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm talking about their two volume set titled "Gauge Theories in Particle Physics". Amazon links:

Volume 1

Volume 2

From looking at the books, it seems that the level is higher compared to Griffiths or Thomson. But, how does it compare to textbooks like Peskin & Schroeder or Schwartz?

What important topics(if any) would a field theory graduate student be missing if they studied out of Aitchison & Hey instead of say Peskin & Schroeder?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd say they're roughly at the same level. What you miss out on depends on what you want to do with it. (I'm more familiar with P&S and Schwartz.) But looking at the content I'd say they're all good; just see which style suits you best.
 

Thread 'Books with a more theoretical approach to turbulence and DNS'

I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
View full post »

Thread 'Blennow to follow up Altland?'

TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...
View full post »

Similar threads

High Energy (free kindle) Gauge Theories in Particle Physics by Aitchison & Hey
Replies
5
Views
2K
Quantum What is the level of Klauber's Student Friendly QFT?
Replies
10
Views
6K
Quantum QFT book recommendations except Peskin/Schroeder
Replies
2
Views
4K
High Energy Possible typo in Peskin & Schroeder's QFT Textbook (p. 666)?
Replies
7
Views
3K
Quantum Is Zuber's Quantum Field Theory textbook any good?
Replies
2
Views
3K
Quantum Books for intermediate to advanced level QFT
Replies
1
Views
2K
Quantum QFT: groups, effective action, fiber bundles, anomalies, EFT
Replies
2
Views
2K
QFT books to continue after Schwartz
Replies
3
Views
4K
High Energy Recommended books in HEP, QFT, QM, GR
Replies
9
Views
5K
A Confusion about creation/annihilation operators with interaction
Replies
1
Views
171

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top