What is the Limit of (1/n!)^(1/3n) as n Approaches Infinity?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the limit of the expression (1/n!)^(1/3n) as n approaches infinity. Participants explore various approaches to understand the behavior of this limit, particularly focusing on the implications of factorial growth and the application of the Squeeze Theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the Squeeze Theorem, questioning the validity of their assumptions and the choice of upper bounds. Some participants suggest comparing the factorial to powers of n to derive inequalities. Others explore the implications of using Stirling's approximation to simplify the limit evaluation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering various insights and suggestions for bounding the expression. There is recognition of the need for rigorous justification of assumptions, and some participants express confidence in their findings while others seek clarification on specific steps. Multiple approaches are being discussed without a clear consensus on the best method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of finding appropriate bounds for the factorial expression and the implications of different choices for the integer b in their inequalities. There is also mention of numerical methods used to verify certain conditions.

Dschumanji
Messages
153
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I need to evaluate the following limit:

lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left(\frac{1}{n!}\right)^{\frac{1}{3n}}

Now, I think I have solved it, but my methods are not rigorous. I am looking to see if my assumptions are sound and if there is an easier way to solve this limit.

Homework Equations


The Squeeze Theorem


The Attempt at a Solution


My main approach to solving this limit is to use the squeeze theorem. I think it is safe to assume that the the expression must be greater than or equal to zero; this provides my lower bound. I want to try and find an upper bound with the following form:

\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)^{\frac{1}{b}}

Where b is some fixed integer. By letting this be the upper bound, I end up with the following inequalities:

0 \leq \left(\frac{1}{n!}\right)^{\frac{1}{3n}} \leq \left(\frac{1}{n}\right)^{\frac{1}{b}}

The problem is to find an integer b that makes the above inequalities true for some value of n greater than 1. This required a bit of guessing and checking since I have no idea how to find exact values to the following inequality (it is the one immediately above involving the expressions with exponenets except that it is rewritten):

n!^{\frac{b}{3}} - n^{n} \geq 0

When I let b = 4, the inequalities become true at around n = 50. This should let me apply the squeeze theorem to conclude that the limit must equal zero, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about looking at n!\leqslant n^{n}? What does that tell you?
 
hunt_mat said:
How about looking at n!\leqslant n^{n}? What does that tell you?
I did use a similar inequality to determine that b cannot be equal to 1, 2, and 3, but it doesn't help in determining if there exists an n greater than 1 such that every n after makes n!^{\frac{4}{3}}-n^{n} \geq 0 a true statement.

Now, if I used the inequality n! \leq n^{n} to help with finding an upper bound you end with the following:

\left(\frac{1}{n!}\right)^{\frac{1}{3n}} \geq \left(\frac{1}{n^{n}}\right)^{\frac{1}{3n}}

Before simplifying, it is clear that n! \leq n^{n} is not a very helpful fact for finding an upper bound since the expression which is supposed to be an upper bound becomes a lower bound. In fact, after simplifying you find out that the right hand side of the inequality turns into the form of upper bound I was originally looking for when b is equal to 3. It shows that b cannot be equal to 3.

This is what I see, am I missing something?
 
What about comparing \displaystyle \left(\frac{1}{n!}\right)^{1/(3n)} \text{ and } \left(\frac{1}{n}\right)^{1/(3n)}\ ?

or \displaystyle \left(\frac{1}{n!}\right)^{1/(3n)} \text{ and } \left(\frac{1}{3n}\right)^{1/(3n)}\ ?
 
SammyS said:
What about comparing \displaystyle \left(\frac{1}{n!}\right)^{1/(3n)} \text{ and } \left(\frac{1}{n}\right)^{1/(3n)}\ ?

or \displaystyle \left(\frac{1}{n!}\right)^{1/(3n)} \text{ and } \left(\frac{1}{3n}\right)^{1/(3n)}\ ?
If you compare the first two, the second expression approaches 1 as n increases without bound. If you compare the next two, the second expression approaches 1 as n increases without bound. If you examine the expression in the original limit, you can see that it does not approach one, it dips down below 1 and slowly approaches what looks like zero. Both of the suggested upper bounds are not useful for the squeeze theorem.
 
Last edited:
Dschumanji said:
If you compare the first two, the second expression approaches 1 as n increases without bound. If you compare the next two, the second expression approaches 1 as n increases without bound. If you examine the expression in the original limit, you can see that it does not approach one, it dips down below 1 and slowly approaches what looks like zero. Both of the suggested upper bounds are not useful for the squeeze theorem.
Yup! Silly mistake on my part.

b = 4 does work, with (n!)^{\frac{b}{3}} - n^{n} \geq 0, for n > 42 .

However, b = 6, gives \displaystyle (n!)^{\frac{b}{3}} - n^{n} \geq 0, for n > 2 , and it's pretty easy to show this.

Also, \displaystyle \lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)^{1/6}=0
 
SammyS said:
Yup! Silly mistake on my part.

b = 4 does work, with (n!)^{\frac{b}{3}} - n^{n} \geq 0, for n > 42 .

However, b = 6, gives \displaystyle (n!)^{\frac{b}{3}} - n^{n} \geq 0, for n > 2 , and it's pretty easy to show this.

Also, \displaystyle \lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)^{1/6}=0
How do you go about solving for n when a specific b is input into the inequality?
 
Numerically. But \displaystyle (n!)^{2} - n^{n} = 0 is true for n = 1, 2.

For b = 4, I used WolframAlpha. Then actually plugged in n=41, which gave a negative answer & n = 42 which gave a positive.
 
SammyS said:
Numerically. But \displaystyle (n!)^{2} - n^{n} = 0 is true for n = 1, 2.

For b = 4, I used WolframAlpha. Then actually plugged in n=41, which gave a negative answer & n = 42 which gave a positive.
Ah, thank you so much SammyS! And thank you everyone else! Letting b equal 6 is definitely much better than letting b equal 4.
 
  • #10
You're welcome! & I apologize again for my mistaken first suggestion.
 
  • #11
Rewrite it as:
<br /> \left(\frac{1}{n!}\right)^{\frac{1}{3 n}} = \exp{\left[-\frac{\ln{(n!)}}{3 n}\right]}<br />
and use Stirling's asymptotic formula:
<br /> \ln{(n!)} \sim \left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right) \, \ln{n} - n, \ n \rightarrow \infty<br />
 
  • #12
Dickfore said:
Rewrite it as:
<br /> \left(\frac{1}{n!}\right)^{\frac{1}{3 n}} = \exp{\left[-\frac{\ln{(n!)}}{3 n}\right]}<br />
and use Stirling's asymptotic formula:
<br /> \ln{(n!)} \sim \left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right) \, \ln{n} - n, \ n \rightarrow \infty<br />
This method is much simpler! I love it! Thank you so much, Dickfore!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K