What is the line integral for the given line segments and parametric equations?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the line integral of the expression ∫ x+yz dx + 2x dy + xyz dz over specified line segments in three-dimensional space. The line segments connect the points (1,0,1) to (2,3,1) and (2,3,1) to (2,5,2).

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different parametric equations for the line segments, with some suggesting alternative parameterizations and questioning the integration limits used by others.
  • There are attempts to verify calculations and clarify misunderstandings regarding the integration process and the resulting values.
  • Some participants express confusion about the integration limits and the implications of the chosen parametric forms on the results.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into their calculations and questioning each other's approaches. There is a recognition of potential errors in the original poster's calculations, and some participants are attempting to clarify the correct integration process without reaching a consensus on the final answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants note discrepancies in the calculated results and the expected correct answer, indicating a need for further exploration of the integral setup and assumptions made during the integration process.

maogden
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the line integral of ∫ x+yz dx + 2x dy + xyz dz

C consists of line segments from (1,0,1) to (2,3,1) and from (2,3,1) to (2,5,2).


Homework Equations



r=(1-t)<r0> + t<r1> 0<t<1

The Attempt at a Solution



I split up the two line segments into C1 and C2.

For C1 I got the parametric equation of x(t)=1+t, y(t)=3t, z(t)=1
I plugged this into the original equation also using dx=dt, dy=3dt, dz=0
This gave me the answer C1=13.

I then found the parametric equations of C2 to be x(t)=2, y(t)=3-2t, z(t)=1-t.
I plugged these into the equations again with their derivatives and got the answer to be -22/3.

I added C1 and C2 and got 17/3 as my answer.

The correct answer should be 97/3.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On the first, if I let:

x=1+t
y=3t
z=1

I get 12.

On the second, how about let

x=2
y=3+2t
z=1+t
 
maogden said:

Homework Statement


Find the line integral of ∫ x+yz dx + 2x dy + xyz dz

C consists of line segments from (1,0,1) to (2,3,1) and from (2,3,1) to (2,5,2).


Homework Equations



r=(1-t)<r0> + t<r1> 0<t<1

The Attempt at a Solution



I split up the two line segments into C1 and C2.

For C1 I got the parametric equation of x(t)=1+t, y(t)=3t, z(t)=1
I plugged this into the original equation also using dx=dt, dy=3dt, dz=0
This gave me the answer C1=13.
If you had shown how you got this, we might have been able to point out a mistake. As it is, we, like jackmell, can only say that your first integral is wrong.

I then found the parametric equations of C2 to be x(t)=2, y(t)=3-2t, z(t)=1-t.
Okay, when t= 0, (x, y, z)= (2, 3, 1) and when t= -1, (x, y, z)= (2, 5, 2). Did you then integrate from 0 to -1?

I plugged these into the equations again with their derivatives and got the answer to be -22/3.

I added C1 and C2 and got 17/3 as my answer.

The correct answer should be 97/3.
 
Sorry I didn't explain my work. I integrated both C1 and C2 from 0 to 1.. why are you integrating it from -1 to 0?

And here's the rest of my work,

C1:
r=(1-t)<1,0,1> + t<2,3,1>
r=<1+t,3t,1>

(from 0 to 1)∫ (1+4t) (1)dt +
(from 0 to 1)∫ (2) (1+t) (3) dt +
(from 0 to 1)∫ (1+t)(3t)(1)(0) dt

[2t^2+t](0 to 1) +
6[t+(t2/2)](0 to 1) +
[t](0 to 1)

(2 + 1) + (6 + 3) + 1 = 13


C2:
r=(1-t)<2,3,1> + t<2,5,2>
r=<2,3-2t,1-t>

(from 0 to 1)∫ 2+(3+2t)(1-t)(0)dt +
(from 0 to 1)∫ 4(-2)dt +
(from 0 to 1)∫ (2)(3-2t)(1-t)(-1) dt

2[t](0 to 1) +
-8[t](0 to 1) +
-2[3t - (5/2)*t2 + (2/3)*t3](0 to 1)

adding these up i got (-19/3) when I redid the problem again.

so C1 + C2 = (20/3)
 
maogden said:
Sorry I didn't explain my work. I integrated both C1 and C2 from 0 to 1.. why are you integrating it from -1 to 0?

And here's the rest of my work,

C1:
r=(1-t)<1,0,1> + t<2,3,1>
r=<1+t,3t,1>

(from 0 to 1)∫ (1+4t) (1)dt +
(from 0 to 1)∫ (2) (1+t) (3) dt +
(from 0 to 1)∫ (1+t)(3t)(1)(0) dt

[2t^2+t](0 to 1) +
6[t+(t2/2)](0 to 1) +
[t](0 to 1)

(2 + 1) + (6 + 3) + 1 = 13

Ok, that third one should be zero because z=1 which means dz=0 right? There you go. Got 36/3 of them.

C2:
r=(1-t)<2,3,1> + t<2,5,2>
r=<2,3-2t,1-t>

(from 0 to 1)∫ 2+(3+2t)(1-t)(0)dt +
(from 0 to 1)∫ 4(-2)dt +
(from 0 to 1)∫ (2)(3-2t)(1-t)(-1) dt

2[t](0 to 1) +
-8[t](0 to 1) +
-2[3t - (5/2)*t2 + (2/3)*t3](0 to 1)

adding these up i got (-19/3) when I redid the problem again.

so C1 + C2 = (20/3)
[/quote]

Now that second one you have:

\mathop\int\limits_{(2,3,2)}^{(2,5,2)} (x+yz)dx+2xdy+xyzdz

Ok, if I let:

x=2
y=3+2t
z=1+t

then I need to let t go from 0 to 1 so it's

\int_0^1 (x+yz)dx+2xdy+xyzdz,\quad x(t)=2, y(t)=3+2t, z(t)=1+t

you can do that I bet.
 
maogden said:
Sorry I didn't explain my work. I integrated both C1 and C2 from 0 to 1.. why are you integrating it from -1 to 0?
I'm not. I asked if you did because your parametric equations, x(t)=2, y(t)=3-2t, z(t)=1-t, give x(0)= 2, y(0)= 3, z(0)= 1, the first point, and x(-1)= 2, y(-1)= 5, z(-1)= 2, the second point.

If you integrate from 0 to 1 then, because x(1)= 2, y(1)= 3- 2= 1, z(1)= 1- 1= 0, you are integrating from (2, 3, 1) to (2, 1, 0) which is not what you wanted to do.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I asked if you did because your parametric equations, x(t)=2, y(t)=3-2t, z(t)=1-t, give x(0)= 2, y(0)= 3, z(0)= 1, the first point, and x(-1)= 2, y(-1)= 5, z(-1)= 2, the second point.

If you integrate from 0 to 1 then, because x(1)= 2, y(1)= 3- 2= 1, z(1)= 1- 1= 0, you are integrating from (2, 3, 1) to (2, 1, 0) which is not what you wanted to do.


Ok I think I understand..

So what you're saying is...

0,-1\int
 
HallsofIvy said:
I asked if you did because your parametric equations, x(t)=2, y(t)=3-2t, z(t)=1-t, give x(0)= 2, y(0)= 3, z(0)= 1, the first point, and x(-1)= 2, y(-1)= 5, z(-1)= 2, the second point.

If you integrate from 0 to 1 then, because x(1)= 2, y(1)= 3- 2= 1, z(1)= 1- 1= 0, you are integrating from (2, 3, 1) to (2, 1, 0) which is not what you wanted to do.

Ok I think I understand..

So what you're saying is...

(from 0 to -1)∫ (2 + (3-2t)(1+2t))(0)dt +
(from 0 to -1)∫ (2(2t))(3)dt +
(from 0 to -1)∫ (2)(3-2t)(2)dt
simplified:
4 * (from 0 to -1)∫ -4t^2 + 4t + 1 dt

4[(-4t^3)/3 + 2t^2 + t] dt <== from 0 to -1

4(4/3 + 2 - 1 - (0 + 0 + 0)) = 28/3

but,
28/3 + 13 ≠ 97/3
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K