B What is the link between proportion and multiplication?

AI Thread Summary
Multiplication and proportion are fundamentally linked through the concept of scaling, where multiplication represents the proportional increase or decrease of a quantity. When multiplying two numbers, such as 7.2 and 3.2, one can visualize this as scaling the original number by a factor that retains the ratio of the two quantities. This scaling applies not only to linear dimensions but also to shapes, where multiplying dimensions maintains the proportional relationships between them. The idea of proportionality can be expressed mathematically as A = k × B, indicating that one quantity is a constant multiple of another. Understanding this relationship clarifies the nature of multiplication as a means of modeling proportional relationships.
Haris045
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
What is the link between proportion and multiplication? WHY DOES and how can multiplication model proportionality?
I found this quote online:

“Multiplication is the mathematical manifestation of the fundamental physical phenomenon of proportionality (as addition is to combination).”

Question 1: How are multiplication and proportion linked? How can and WHY DOES multiplication model proportion? (My understanding of proportion is the equivalence of ratios)

Also saw this "Multiplication is scaling a number up proportionally up or down"

Question 2: What does this mean to scale something up proportionally , proportionally to WHAT? . e.g. if I had 7.2 * 3.2 , how do I think of that as proportionally scaling? What am I scaling proportionally to what?

Edit:

These questions were formed when I was doing re-search on the true nature of multiplication, some things I have read about this topic:

https://www.maa.org/external_archive/devlin/devlin_06_08.html and https://www.maa.org/external_archive/devlin/devlin_01_11.html

I have also tried to read " Development of Multiplicative Reasoning in the Learning of Mathematics" it talked about multiplicative conceptual fields but it got quite confusing and dragged on and I didn't really understand the book.

Thanks in advance for the help!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Haris045 said:
Question 2: What does this mean to scale something up proportionally , proportionally to WHAT? . e.g. if I had 7.2 * 3.2 , how do I think of that as proportionally scaling? What am I scaling proportionally to what?
You are scaling either number proportionally to its original 'size' or 'quantity'.
It's easier with whole numbers, so let's say we are multiplying 7x3.
Think of the number 7 as a line that's 7 units long. Multiplying by 3 means that we increase the length of the original line until it is 3x longer. And, since multiplication of two real numbers is commutative, meaning that the order you place them in doesn't matter, you can consider 3 to be scaled up by 7x. You can think about it as if it is the same line that's just been stretched out. The line is now larger than it was originally, meaning its proportions have increased.

In this case the only proportion it has is length since it's a line, but the same concept applies to things like 2d and 3d shapes where a multiplication by a single number scales all proportions up or down such that the new shape retains the same ratios in its proportions as the old. That is, a square whose side lengths are multiplied by 2x still has a 1-to-1 ratio of its new side lengths. A rectangle with sides 1x2 in length that are multiplied by 2x now has sides of 2x4, which have the same 1-to-2 ratio as their original lengths.
 
Did you find any of the replies you got to a similar question a week and a half ago useful?
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu, pbuk, berkeman and 1 other person
Haris045 said:
Summary: What is the link between proportion and multiplication? WHY DOES and how can multiplication model proportionality?

How are multiplication and proportion linked?
The statement “A is proportional to B” means ##A=k \times B##
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes mcastillo356, Drakkith and hutchphd
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top