B What is the link between proportion and multiplication?

Haris045
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
What is the link between proportion and multiplication? WHY DOES and how can multiplication model proportionality?
I found this quote online:

“Multiplication is the mathematical manifestation of the fundamental physical phenomenon of proportionality (as addition is to combination).”

Question 1: How are multiplication and proportion linked? How can and WHY DOES multiplication model proportion? (My understanding of proportion is the equivalence of ratios)

Also saw this "Multiplication is scaling a number up proportionally up or down"

Question 2: What does this mean to scale something up proportionally , proportionally to WHAT? . e.g. if I had 7.2 * 3.2 , how do I think of that as proportionally scaling? What am I scaling proportionally to what?

Edit:

These questions were formed when I was doing re-search on the true nature of multiplication, some things I have read about this topic:

https://www.maa.org/external_archive/devlin/devlin_06_08.html and https://www.maa.org/external_archive/devlin/devlin_01_11.html

I have also tried to read " Development of Multiplicative Reasoning in the Learning of Mathematics" it talked about multiplicative conceptual fields but it got quite confusing and dragged on and I didn't really understand the book.

Thanks in advance for the help!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Haris045 said:
Question 2: What does this mean to scale something up proportionally , proportionally to WHAT? . e.g. if I had 7.2 * 3.2 , how do I think of that as proportionally scaling? What am I scaling proportionally to what?
You are scaling either number proportionally to its original 'size' or 'quantity'.
It's easier with whole numbers, so let's say we are multiplying 7x3.
Think of the number 7 as a line that's 7 units long. Multiplying by 3 means that we increase the length of the original line until it is 3x longer. And, since multiplication of two real numbers is commutative, meaning that the order you place them in doesn't matter, you can consider 3 to be scaled up by 7x. You can think about it as if it is the same line that's just been stretched out. The line is now larger than it was originally, meaning its proportions have increased.

In this case the only proportion it has is length since it's a line, but the same concept applies to things like 2d and 3d shapes where a multiplication by a single number scales all proportions up or down such that the new shape retains the same ratios in its proportions as the old. That is, a square whose side lengths are multiplied by 2x still has a 1-to-1 ratio of its new side lengths. A rectangle with sides 1x2 in length that are multiplied by 2x now has sides of 2x4, which have the same 1-to-2 ratio as their original lengths.
 
Did you find any of the replies you got to a similar question a week and a half ago useful?
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu, pbuk, berkeman and 1 other person
Haris045 said:
Summary: What is the link between proportion and multiplication? WHY DOES and how can multiplication model proportionality?

How are multiplication and proportion linked?
The statement “A is proportional to B” means ##A=k \times B##
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes mcastillo356, Drakkith and hutchphd
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top