What is the Magnetic Field Inside a Tightly Wound Ring?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the magnetic field inside a tightly wound ring of wire, where the wire is wound in a single layer and carries a current. The problem involves understanding the configuration of the wire, the application of relevant magnetic field equations, and the implications of the ring's physical properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of the Biot-Savart law and Ampere's law to calculate the magnetic field. Questions arise regarding the configuration of the wire, whether it follows the circular shape of the ring or forms a torus, and how to incorporate the number of turns (N) into the calculations. There is also discussion about the implications of the wire's insulation and the material of the ring.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the application of different laws and questioning the assumptions about the wire's configuration. Some suggest using Ampere's law while others consider the Biot-Savart law, indicating a range of interpretations being explored. Guidance has been offered regarding the use of total current in the context of multiple turns.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the wire's configuration and the distinction between an isolated wire and one that is not, as well as the implications of the ring's material. There is an ongoing clarification about the specific point in space where the magnetic field is to be evaluated.

mtr
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A wire is reeled on a ring (radii [tex]R_{1}[/tex] and [tex]R_{2}[/tex]). Find the induction of a magnetic field in the middle of the ring, if there is a current I through the wire and there are N waps. Waps are reeled very tightly in only 1 layer.

Homework Equations


[tex]H=\frac{IN}{l}[/tex]
[tex]B=\mu H[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to think about the ring as about one wap of a coil, however I have no idea how to figure out a current inside the ring. I also do not really understand in which part of this construction I should look for induction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The current inside the ring (or, more clearly, along the circumference) is given in your problem statement - it's [tex]I[/tex]. The magnetic field in center can be calculated from Biot-Savart law:

[tex]d\mathbf{B} = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \frac{Id\mathbf{l}\times \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2}[/tex]
 
How exactly is it reeled? Does the wire follow the circular shape of the ring or does it pass through the hole repeatedly?
 
The wire is reeled as tightly as possible and follows the circular shape of the ring.

Irid said:
The current inside the ring (or, more clearly, along the circumference) is given in your problem statement - it's [tex]I[/tex]. The magnetic field in center can be calculated from Biot-Savart law:

[tex]d\mathbf{B} = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \frac{Id\mathbf{l}\times \mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r^2}[/tex]

Thanks for help, but I have one more question. I read, that Biot-Savart law behaves a little bit different, when the wire's size is important. Do you think I should use:
[tex]d\vec B = K_m \frac{ \vec j \times \mathbf{\hat r}} {r^2} dV[/tex]?
I think it might be important, because in the task there are given [tex]R_{1}[/tex] and [tex]R_{2}[/tex], so I can actually count ring's volume. I am also not sure what to do, if the wire is isolated from the ring or the ring is not made from conductor, but e.g. from plastic etc.
 
Defennder said:
How exactly is it reeled? Does the wire follow the circular shape of the ring or does it pass through the hole repeatedly?

This is a good observation! Is the wire reeled along the circumference of the ring, or is it reeled around the ring to form a torus?

I supposed it was the former case. If the ring is of finite extent from R1 to R2, I think you should consider a plane current flowing uniformly in a strip from R1 to R2.
 
Well if the wire is reeled in that manner doesn't that reduce the setup to one of a current carrying solenoid?
 
The wire forms a torus.
 
mtr said:
I am also not sure what to do, if the wire is isolated from the ring or the ring is not made from conductor, but e.g. from plastic etc.

Usually one considers an isolated wire (metal wrapped around with plastic coating), so it doesn't matter what the ring is made of. If the wire wasn't isolated, it would short-circuit and you couldn't have N wounds.
 
Well, now you're saying it forms a torus. That corresponds to the wire passing through the ring hole repeatedly.
 
  • #10
OK, it forms a torus. For sure.
 
  • #11
In the torus case, you should use Ampere's law:

[tex]\oint \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = \mu_0 I[/tex]

where [tex]d\mathbf{l}[/tex] points around along the circumference of the torus. R1 probably is the radius of the torus, while R2 is the radius of the loop of current, or vice versa.
 
  • #12
So why do I need N - number of waps? Usually known data should be somehow used in such problems.
[tex]R_{1}[/tex] is the radius of a hole inside a ring and [tex]R_{2}[/tex] is the radius of the loop of current.
 
  • #13
In Ampere's law the current [tex]I[/tex] is the total current pierced by integration. In your case, the current in one loop is [tex]I[/tex], so the total is [tex]NI[/tex]. Just change in the law [tex]I \rightarrow NI[/tex].
 
  • #14
Another question on clarification, you want to find the B field within the solid ring itself or at the point in space corresponding the centre of the hole of the ring?
 
  • #15
Defennder said:
Another question on clarification, you want to find the B field within the solid ring itself or at the point in space corresponding the centre of the hole of the ring?

I am looking for B at the point in the centre of the hole of the ring.

Irid said:
In Ampere's law the current [tex]I[/tex] is the total current pierced by integration. In your case, the current in one loop is [tex]I[/tex], so the total is [tex]NI[/tex]. Just change in the law [tex]I \rightarrow NI[/tex].

So actually in this case I should use [tex]B=\frac{\mu _{0} N I}{l}[/tex] ?
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Well, just think of it in terms Ampere's circuital law. Try to set up the closed line integral in a way which exploits the symmetry of the torus geometrically. You should be able to get a rough idea of what the magnitude of the B field should be.

The alternative, I think would be to evaluate the B-field directly in toroidal coordinates. Unfortunately I have no idea how to do so, and it does look horribly complicated:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ToroidalCoordinates.html
 
  • #17
I think it's possible to do this by parametrising the space curve of the wire. From:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Slinky.html
you should see that the parametric path would have the form:
[tex]x = (1+a\cos(wt))\cos t[/tex]
[tex]y = (1+a\cos(wt))\sin t[/tex]
[tex]z = a\sin (wt)[/tex]

Now what you need to do is work out the values of w and a so that it fits the parameters of your problem and evaluate the line integral using the Biot-Savart law.

Unfortunately it appears that it is extremely tedious to do this by hand. I just entered the integral expression into the Wolfram online integrator and it tells me
Sorry, The Integrator was unable to finish doing this integral in the time allotted. Try running it in Mathematica on your own computer. (Download a trial version of Mathematica [here].)

Oh well, so if you want a quick answer just use your intuition and Ampere's circuital law.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K