What Is the Mathematical Definition of the Microcanonical Partition Function?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical definition of the microcanonical partition function in statistical mechanics, particularly focusing on its formulation and implications in classical systems.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of the microcanonical partition function, questioning the meaning of specific terms like E_0 and discussing the implications of continuous states in classical systems.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants providing insights into the nature of the microcanonical partition function and its relation to phase space. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculation of phase space volume and the uniform probability distribution over that volume.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the constraints involved in defining the partition function, particularly in relation to continuous variables in classical mechanics.

Pacopag
Messages
193
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Does anyone know the mathematical definition of the microcanonical partition function?
I've seen
[tex]\Omega = {E_0\over{N!h^{3n}}}\int d^{3N}q d^{3N}p \delta(H - E)[/tex]
where H=H(p,q) is the Hamiltonian. This looks like a useful definition.
Only thing is I don't know what [tex]E_0[/tex] is.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The microcanonical partition function is just a count of the number of states that satisfy extensive constraints on volume, energy, etc. The probability of each state is then trivially one over the partition function.
 
But in the case of a classical system the number of states is uncountable because the position and momenta are continuous.
 
In which case you can still calculate the phase space volume and the probability distribution is uniform over that volume --- it's the obvious generalisation.
 
Ok. Good. Now I see why my "hint" was to bring the constant energy surface in phase space into a sphere (because I know how to find the volume of a sphere).

Thank you very much genneth.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K