MHB What Is the Maximum Area of This Isosceles Trapezoid?

checkitagain
Messages
137
Reaction score
1
Given:

an isosceles trapezoid

The shorter base is 8 units in length

The slant height is 12 units in length.What is the maximum area that this isosceles trapezoid could have?

You could answer with either an exact number, or an answer
where the value is to the nearest hundredths of square units,
if the exact value is "too cumbersome."
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
checkittwice said:
Given:

an isosceles trapezoid

The shorter base is 8 units in length

The slant height is 12 units in length.What is the maximum area that this isosceles trapezoid could have?

You could answer with either an exact number, or an answer
where the value is to the nearest hundredths of square units,
if the exact value is "too cumbersome."

Let the other base be of length \(8+2x\), then the area is:

\[ A(x)=8\sqrt{12^2-x^2}+x\sqrt{12^2-x^2} \]

subject to the constraints that \( x \in [0,12] \).

This is a constrained maximisation problem, so the maximum occurs at a calculus type local maxima of \(A(x)\) in the interior of the feasible region or at a boundary point.

The maximum area is \(\approx 146.345 \) square units and occurs when \( x=2(-1+\sqrt{19} ) \approx 6.7178 \) units

Exact area (courtesy of Maxima): \(\left( 2\,\sqrt{19}+6\right) \,\sqrt{8\,\sqrt{19}+64}\)

(note: copy and past of LaTeX from Maxima works perfectly)

CB
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top