MHB What Is the Maximum Area of This Isosceles Trapezoid?

AI Thread Summary
The maximum area of the isosceles trapezoid with a shorter base of 8 units and a slant height of 12 units is approximately 146.345 square units. This maximum occurs when the variable \( x \) is approximately 6.7178 units. The area can be expressed as a function \( A(x) = 8\sqrt{12^2-x^2}+x\sqrt{12^2-x^2} \), which is maximized through calculus methods. The exact area can also be represented using the formula \(\left( 2\,\sqrt{19}+6\right) \,\sqrt{8\,\sqrt{19}+64}\). The problem illustrates a constrained maximization scenario within specified boundaries.
checkitagain
Messages
137
Reaction score
1
Given:

an isosceles trapezoid

The shorter base is 8 units in length

The slant height is 12 units in length.What is the maximum area that this isosceles trapezoid could have?

You could answer with either an exact number, or an answer
where the value is to the nearest hundredths of square units,
if the exact value is "too cumbersome."
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
checkittwice said:
Given:

an isosceles trapezoid

The shorter base is 8 units in length

The slant height is 12 units in length.What is the maximum area that this isosceles trapezoid could have?

You could answer with either an exact number, or an answer
where the value is to the nearest hundredths of square units,
if the exact value is "too cumbersome."

Let the other base be of length \(8+2x\), then the area is:

\[ A(x)=8\sqrt{12^2-x^2}+x\sqrt{12^2-x^2} \]

subject to the constraints that \( x \in [0,12] \).

This is a constrained maximisation problem, so the maximum occurs at a calculus type local maxima of \(A(x)\) in the interior of the feasible region or at a boundary point.

The maximum area is \(\approx 146.345 \) square units and occurs when \( x=2(-1+\sqrt{19} ) \approx 6.7178 \) units

Exact area (courtesy of Maxima): \(\left( 2\,\sqrt{19}+6\right) \,\sqrt{8\,\sqrt{19}+64}\)

(note: copy and past of LaTeX from Maxima works perfectly)

CB
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top