What is the method for finding inflection points for a given function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DMOC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding inflection points for the function f(x) = (x^2 - 3)e^x. It identifies that f is increasing for x < -3 and x > 1, based on the first derivative f'(x). The second derivative f''(x) is calculated, but the user struggles to find when it equals zero, suggesting the use of the quadratic formula to determine potential inflection points. The absolute maximum of the function is evaluated, concluding that there is no absolute maximum as f(x) increases indefinitely for values greater than 1. The importance of confirming a change in concavity at points where f''(x) = 0 is also emphasized.
DMOC
Messages
98
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let f be the function f(x) = (x2 - 3)ex for all real #'s x.

a. What values of x is f increasing?
b. What are the x-coordinates of the inflection points for f?
c. Where (by finding the x and y coordinates of a point) is f(x) at its absolute maximum.

Homework Equations



Product rule: uv' + vu'

The Attempt at a Solution



PART A

f(x) = (x2 - 3)ex
f '(x) = ex(x2 + 2x -3)

x = 1 and x = -3

If x < -3, f '(x) is positive which means that f is increasing.
Same thing for x > 1

:. f increases when x < -3 and x > 1

PART B

This is the part where I encounter trouble. Usually I have no problem with these types of problems ... but I can't find when the second derivative equals zero.

f '(x) = ex(x2 + 2x -3)
f ''(x) = ex(x2 +4x -1)

This is a no-calculator-at-all problem so it has to be relatively easy to find when f ''(x) = 0. Here, it's not. Did I make a mistake somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the quadratic formula

x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^{2} - 4ac}}{2a}

No mistakes so far...
 
miqbal said:
Use the quadratic formula

x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^{2} - 4ac}}{2a}

No mistakes so far...

Probably should have done that. I have a habit of viewing the quadratic formula as finding values with lots of decimals but don't round to a fraction. Definitely not the case.

Anyway, here it is.

x = -2 + (root20)/2
x = -2 - (root20)/2

Moving on to part c.

*The absolute maximum point must either be at x=-3 or beyond the point where x=1.

If x = -3, then ...

f(-3) = 6e-3

If x = a number above 1 (maybe 5)

f(5) = 22e5

f(5)>f(-3)

Having greater values of x will only yield higher results; therefore there is no absolute maximum.

Do you think this is ok as a final answer or should I add on to this?
 
Anyone have their opinions on what I should add to the answer?
 
Remember that a point where f''(x) = 0 is only a potential inflection point. To actually be one, you must show a change in concavity there. You can usually do this by observing that f''(x) changes sign at that point.

Not every point where f''(x) = 0 is an inflection point. Consider f(x) = x4 at x = 0.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K