What is the Method for Finding the Local Minimum of a Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JG89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Local Minimum
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the function f(x) = (x^8 + 9x^9 - 12x^{13}) / (1 + x^3 - x^6) has a local minimum at x = 0. Participants agree that for a local minimum, f'(0) must equal 0, and they explore methods to differentiate the function, including using the product rule and Taylor expansion. One contributor suggests that f(x) can be expressed as x^8 multiplied by a positive function near x = 0, simplifying the proof of the local minimum without extensive calculations. The conversation also touches on the relationship between the second derivative and the nature of the minimum, clarifying that a positive second derivative indicates a minimum but is not a necessary condition. Overall, the participants collaboratively work through the problem, emphasizing different approaches to reach the conclusion.
JG89
Messages
724
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Show that the function f(x) = \frac{x^8 + 9x^9 - 12x^{13}}{1 + x^3 - x^6} has a local minimum at x = 0.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



If f is to have a local minimum at x = 0 then we must have f'(0) = 0. Without typing up the tedious calculations, is this the correct procedure:

f(x) = (x^8 + 9x^9 - 12x^{13}) \frac{1}{1 - (x^3 +x^6)}. Let u = x^3 + x^6. Then f(x) = (x^8 + 9x^9 - 12x^{13}) \frac{1}{1-u} = (x^8 + 9x^9 - 12x^{13}) (1 + u + u^2 + ...).

I can differentiate this using the product rule (and differentiate the expression on the right hand side term by term) or I can multiply both brackets and then differentiate term by term, remembering that u is a function of x. It seems to me for that f'(x), every term will be of the form x^i for some integer i, and so f'(0) = 0??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you wrote this: f(x) = (x^8 + 9x^9 - 12x^{13}) \frac{1}{1-u} = (x^8 + 9x^9 - 12x^{13}) (1 + u + u^2 + ...) --- how did you know that |u| = |x^3 + x^6| < 1 in order for the convergent geometric series as you had defined holds?
 
There is some neighborhood about x = 0 such that |x^3 + x^6| < 1.

EDIT: To be more specific, |x^3 + x^6| <= |x^3| + |x^6|. It's possible to find x values close enough to 0 so that both |x^3| and |x^6| are less than 1/2 and so |x^3| + |x^6| < 1.
 
Last edited:
Dick, if you're reading this, as I was making my reply to fmam3, I noticed your post. How come you deleted it?
 
Can't you just derive once to make sure f'(0)=0 and derive a second time to check f''(0)>0? And for the record \frac{1}{1+x^{3}-x^{6}}\neq\frac{1}{1-(x^{3}+x^{6})}.
 
JG89 said:
Dick, if you're reading this, as I was making my reply to fmam3, I noticed your post. How come you deleted it?

I deleted it because it was incomplete and I was too tired to fix it. Sorry. But your function can be written as f(x)=x^8*p(x), where p(x) is positive in a neighborhood of x=0, right? Doesn't that show f(x) has a local minimum at x=0 without even worrying about any derivatives or infinite series? f(0)=0 at x=0 and is nonzero otherwise in the neighborhood.
 
Damn, that's simple. Thanks Dick. The question said beside it "Hint: Taylor Expansion" so I figured I'd use an infinite series, but that's way more complicated.

Just one question though, since I can write the infinite series as (x^8 +9x^9 - 12x^{13})(1 + u + u^2 + ...), u = x^6 - x^3, then the term with the smallest exponent would be x^8 after multiplying through, and so f'(0) = f''(0) = 0. Since there is a local minimum at x = 0, shouldn't the second derivative be positive at x = 0?
 
JG89 said:
Damn, that's simple. Thanks Dick. The question said beside it "Hint: Taylor Expansion" so I figured I'd use an infinite series, but that's way more complicated.

Just one question though, since I can write the infinite series as (x^8 +9x^9 - 12x^{13})(1 + u + u^2 + ...), u = x^6 - x^3, then the term with the smallest exponent would be x^8 after multiplying through, and so f'(0) = f''(0) = 0. Since there is a local minimum at x = 0, shouldn't the second derivative be positive at x = 0?

Mmm, no. If the second derivative is positive it's a minimum. That doesn't mean if it's a minimum then the second derivative is positive. Look at f(x)=x^8.
 
Ah, I see. Once again, thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K