What is the metric for a bag-of-gold spacetime?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The metric for a "bag-of-gold" spacetime is complex due to its composition of at least two regions with distinct properties that are interconnected. A comprehensive mathematical treatment is provided in section III (b) of the paper available at arxiv.org/abs/0803.4212. Understanding this metric requires "A" level background knowledge, as a "B" level discussion is insufficient. The relationship between the regions in this spacetime differs from the Openheimer-Snyder (OS) collapse case, which involves two different metrics for two distinct manifolds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein Field Equations
  • Familiarity with Schwarzschild and Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metrics
  • Knowledge of Einstein-Rosen bridges
  • Advanced mathematical skills for spacetime analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical treatment in section III (b) of arxiv.org/abs/0803.4212
  • Explore the implications of the "bag of gold" spacetime in relation to black hole interiors
  • Investigate the Openheimer-Snyder collapse case and its metrics
  • Learn about the properties and implications of Einstein-Rosen bridges
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, cosmologists, and advanced students studying general relativity and black hole physics.

Onyx
Messages
141
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
What is the metric for a bag-of-gold spacetime?
What is the metric for a bag-of-gold spacetime?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Onyx said:
What is the metric for a bag-of-gold spacetime?
There is no simple expression for the metric for this spacetime, since it consists of (at least) two regions with very different properties that are "glued" together. However, a good mathematical treatment can be found in section III (b) of this paper:

https://arxiv.org/abs/0803.4212

Note, though, that this paper requires "A" level background knowledge to properly understand. A "B" level discussion of the "bag of gold" spacetime and its implications is not really possible.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
PeterDonis said:
There is no simple expression for the metric for this spacetime, since it consists of (at least) two regions with very different properties that are "glued" together. However, a good mathematical treatment can be found in section III (b) of this paper:

https://arxiv.org/abs/0803.4212

Note, though, that this paper requires "A" level background knowledge to properly understand. A "B" level discussion of the "bag of gold" spacetime and its implications is not really possible.
Is that because the gluing process is so complicated?
 
Onyx said:
Is that because the gluing process is so complicated?
Not really, the black hole interior can be interpreted as a "bag of gold" even without gluing. See https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2854
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke and Ibix
Demystifier said:
Not really, the black hole interior can be interpreted as a "bag of gold" even without gluing. See https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2854
Am I correct in assuming that it is just like the OS collapse case, where there has to be two different metrics for two different manifolds? Also, if not a bag of gold, what is this person describing (not a reliable source)?
 
Onyx said:
Am I correct in assuming that it is just like the OS collapse case, where there has to be two different metrics for two different manifolds?
What's OS?
 
Onyx said:
Is that because the gluing process is so complicated?
Not really, no. The diagrams in Fig. 3 of the paper are fairly straightforward to understand. But the mathematical details required to verify that everything actually can fit together the way those diagrams depict while satisfying the Einstein Field Equation are not.
 
  • #10
Onyx said:
Am I correct in assuming that it is just like the OS collapse case, where there has to be two different metrics for two different manifolds?
The "gluing" process at the boundary between two regions follows the same general rules in both cases, yes. But the relationship between the regions is not the same in the two cases.

In the OS case, we have a Schwarzschild region extending in from infinity, with ##r## (the areal radius) decreasing monotonically, to a boundary with a closed FRW region, and the closed FRW region occupies the rest of the spacetime, with ##r## continuing to decrease to ##r = 0##.

In the "bag of gold" case described in Fig. 3 of the paper, we have a Schwarzschild region extending in from infinity all the way through an Einstein-Rosen bridge, where ##r## (the areal radius) reaches a minimum, and then ##r## increasing again to a boundary with a closed FRW region, in which ##r## continues to increase to some maximum value (given as ##a_{12}## in the diagram) and then decreases again. (The spacetime could end with that first FRW region decreasing to ##r = 0##, but in Fig. 3 of the paper, it doesn't, there is a second Schwarzschild region going through a second Einstein-Rosen bridge and connecting to a second FRW region that ends by decreasing to ##r = 0##. In principle you could have any number of such transitions added on.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
984
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K