What is the metric for a bag-of-gold spacetime?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the metric for a "bag-of-gold" spacetime, which involves complex regions with differing properties. Participants explore the mathematical treatment of this spacetime and its implications, referencing specific papers and theoretical frameworks.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that there is no simple expression for the metric of the bag-of-gold spacetime due to its composition of at least two regions with different properties that are "glued" together.
  • One participant references a paper that provides a mathematical treatment of the spacetime, emphasizing the need for "A" level background knowledge to understand it.
  • Another participant questions whether the complexity of the gluing process contributes to the lack of a simple metric.
  • Some argue that the black hole interior can be interpreted as a "bag of gold" without the need for gluing, suggesting alternative interpretations.
  • There is a discussion about the similarities between the bag-of-gold spacetime and the Oppenheimer-Snyder (OS) collapse case, with some participants drawing parallels regarding the need for different metrics for different manifolds.
  • One participant expresses reservations about the interpretation of the black hole interior as a bag of gold, referring to a previous thread for context.
  • Participants discuss the mathematical details required to verify the compatibility of the regions in the spacetime, indicating that while diagrams may be straightforward, the underlying mathematics is complex.
  • Another participant elaborates on the relationship between regions in the OS case and the bag-of-gold case, highlighting differences in the structure of the metrics involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretation of the bag-of-gold spacetime or the implications of the gluing process. Multiple competing views and interpretations remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on advanced mathematical concepts and the unresolved nature of the relationships between different regions in the spacetime. The discussion also highlights the complexity of verifying the compatibility of the metrics involved.

Onyx
Messages
141
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
What is the metric for a bag-of-gold spacetime?
What is the metric for a bag-of-gold spacetime?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Onyx said:
What is the metric for a bag-of-gold spacetime?
There is no simple expression for the metric for this spacetime, since it consists of (at least) two regions with very different properties that are "glued" together. However, a good mathematical treatment can be found in section III (b) of this paper:

https://arxiv.org/abs/0803.4212

Note, though, that this paper requires "A" level background knowledge to properly understand. A "B" level discussion of the "bag of gold" spacetime and its implications is not really possible.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
PeterDonis said:
There is no simple expression for the metric for this spacetime, since it consists of (at least) two regions with very different properties that are "glued" together. However, a good mathematical treatment can be found in section III (b) of this paper:

https://arxiv.org/abs/0803.4212

Note, though, that this paper requires "A" level background knowledge to properly understand. A "B" level discussion of the "bag of gold" spacetime and its implications is not really possible.
Is that because the gluing process is so complicated?
 
Onyx said:
Is that because the gluing process is so complicated?
Not really, the black hole interior can be interpreted as a "bag of gold" even without gluing. See https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2854
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke and Ibix
Demystifier said:
Not really, the black hole interior can be interpreted as a "bag of gold" even without gluing. See https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2854
Am I correct in assuming that it is just like the OS collapse case, where there has to be two different metrics for two different manifolds? Also, if not a bag of gold, what is this person describing (not a reliable source)?
 
Onyx said:
Am I correct in assuming that it is just like the OS collapse case, where there has to be two different metrics for two different manifolds?
What's OS?
 
Onyx said:
Is that because the gluing process is so complicated?
Not really, no. The diagrams in Fig. 3 of the paper are fairly straightforward to understand. But the mathematical details required to verify that everything actually can fit together the way those diagrams depict while satisfying the Einstein Field Equation are not.
 
  • #10
Onyx said:
Am I correct in assuming that it is just like the OS collapse case, where there has to be two different metrics for two different manifolds?
The "gluing" process at the boundary between two regions follows the same general rules in both cases, yes. But the relationship between the regions is not the same in the two cases.

In the OS case, we have a Schwarzschild region extending in from infinity, with ##r## (the areal radius) decreasing monotonically, to a boundary with a closed FRW region, and the closed FRW region occupies the rest of the spacetime, with ##r## continuing to decrease to ##r = 0##.

In the "bag of gold" case described in Fig. 3 of the paper, we have a Schwarzschild region extending in from infinity all the way through an Einstein-Rosen bridge, where ##r## (the areal radius) reaches a minimum, and then ##r## increasing again to a boundary with a closed FRW region, in which ##r## continues to increase to some maximum value (given as ##a_{12}## in the diagram) and then decreases again. (The spacetime could end with that first FRW region decreasing to ##r = 0##, but in Fig. 3 of the paper, it doesn't, there is a second Schwarzschild region going through a second Einstein-Rosen bridge and connecting to a second FRW region that ends by decreasing to ##r = 0##. In principle you could have any number of such transitions added on.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K