What is the minimum length of chain that must hang down for it to begin sliding?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dorothy Weglend
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a uniform chain resting on a table, with part of it hanging off the edge. Participants are exploring the dynamics of the chain as it begins to slide off the table, considering factors such as kinetic friction and potential energy changes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are analyzing the forces acting on the chain, including normal and frictional forces, and discussing the conservation of energy principles. There are questions about the heights involved in potential energy calculations and the implications of the chain's center of mass.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on focusing on the change in potential energy and the work done against friction. There is ongoing exploration of the assumptions regarding the chain's position and the effects of it potentially touching the floor. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the height of the table and the assumption that the chain does not touch the floor during its motion. Participants are also considering the implications of the coefficient of static friction in determining the minimum length of the chain that must hang down for sliding to commence.

Dorothy Weglend
Messages
247
Reaction score
2
A uniform chain of 8.00 m lies stretched out on a horizontal table. 3m of it is hanging of the end of the table. Determine the speed of the chain as all of it leaves the table, assuming a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.400.

Here's what I have done so far:

Let x represent the amount the chain has slipped off the table, so (5 - x) is the amount left on the table. U is the mass per meter. So the normal force is

N = (5-x)U*g

and the friction force is

Fk = 0.4(5-x)U*g

Conservation gives:

U0 + K0 - Fk = U1 + K1

K0 = 0 so

m0*g*y0 + m1*g*y1 - integral_0_5(Fk) = mT*v^2/2 + mT*g*y

And substituting the mass values and friction function:

(5*U*g)y0 + (3*U*g)y1 - integral_0_5(0.4(5-x)U*g) = (8*U*g)v^2/2 + (8*U*g)y

I think this is right, (please tell me if it isn't) but I can't figure out what to do about the heights, y0, y1 and y? :confused:

y0 should just be the height of the table, but I don't know that, it's not given in the problem.

And y1 should be the height of the dangling part of the chain from the floor. But at what point? The beginning, the end? Do I just take the average height (the middle of the chain? And what is the final y?

I think most tables are about 4m high. And when I think about adding this to the problem, I just get that tired feeling :rolleyes:

Thanks for any advice or help.

Dorothy
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you say the chain has zero potential energy on the table, then the potential energy as it slides off is increasingly negative. It would be the mass of the part of the chain hanging over times the negative distance of the center of that mass from the top of the table, or half the length of the overhang.
 
Dorothy Weglend said:
A uniform chain of 8.00 m lies stretched out on a horizontal table. Determine the speed of the chain as all of it leaves the table, assuming a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.400.

Here's what I have done so far:

Let x represent the amount the chain has slipped off the table, so (5 - x) is the amount left on the table. U is the mass per meter. So the normal force is
Is the chain 8.00 m long? Or 5 m long? Where did that 5 come from?

N = (5-x)U*g

and the friction force is

Fk = 0.4(5-x)U*g

Conservation gives:

U0 + K0 - Fk = U1 + K1

K0 = 0 so
OK.

m0*g*y0 + m1*g*y1 - integral_0_5(Fk) = mT*v^2/2 + mT*g*y
Don't know what happened here. What are all those heights? y0 and y1 make sense, but what is y? And all those masses? And what does T stand for?
And substituting the mass values and friction function:

(5*U*g)y0 = (3*U*g)y1 - integral_0_5(0.4(5-x)U*g) = (8*U*g)v^2/2 + (8*U*g)y

I think this is right, (please tell me if it isn't) but I can't figure out what to do about the heights, y0, y1 and y? :confused:

y0 should just be the height of the table, but I don't know that, it's not given in the problem.

And y1 should be the height of the dangling part of the chain from the floor. But at what point? The beginning, the end? Do I just take the average height (the middle of the chain? And what is the final y?

I think most tables are about 4m high. And when I think about adding this to the problem, I just get that tired feeling :rolleyes:
The height of the table doesn't matter. All that matters is the change in potential energy of the chain. Hint: How does the position of the center of mass change?

Your overall idea of using energy methods is good:
What's the change in PE of the chain? (Clean that up.)
What's the work done against friction? (Your method looks OK.)
What's the final KE of the chain? (That's what you'll determine.)
 
So you are saying I don't need the mgy0 term at all?

and y1 = -1.5, y = -4? I will try this, thank you very much.

Dorothy
 
Doc Al said:
Is the chain 8.00 m long? Or 5 m long? Where did that 5 come from?[\QUOTE]

Sorry. I am chagrined. 3m are hanging off the edge of the table already, so 5m is left on the table. I fixed the original post too. Sorry about that.


Don't know what happened here. What are all those heights? y0 and y1 make sense, but what is y? And all those masses? And what does T stand for?

m0 is the mass of the chain on the table, m1 is the mass of the chain that is hanging. And T is total mass, mT, because at the end the whole chain is off the table. And yes, what is y? If I take the center of the chain, that should be 4, I guess. But I still am not clear about what should happen if part of the chain is piling up on the floor.

The height of the table doesn't matter. All that matters is the change in potential energy of the chain. Hint: How does the position of the center of mass change?

I haven't learned about this center of mass thing yet, but OlderDan mentioned that, it makes sense. But won't the center of mass change if part of the chain is lying on the floor? Or should I just assume an infinitely high table?

Your overall idea of using energy methods is good:
What's the change in PE of the chain? (Clean that up.)
What's the work done against friction? (Your method looks OK.)
What's the final KE of the chain? (That's what you'll determine.)

Thank you, Doc Al. I will work on this some more. I appreciate your help, as always.

Dorothy
 
Last edited:
Dorothy Weglend said:
Sorry. I am chagrined. 3m are hanging off the edge of the table already, so 5m is left on the table. I fixed the original post too. Sorry about that.
My bad. I didn't read carefully.

m0 is the mass of the chain on the table, m1 is the mass of the chain that is hanging. And T is total mass, mT, because at the end the whole chain is off the table. And yes, what is y? If I take the center of the chain, that should be 4, I guess. But I still am not clear about what should happen if part of the chain is piling up on the floor.
I see your point about the chain piling up on the floor, but my guess is that you are to assume that at no point does the chain touch the floor. (If it does, things are different--energy will be lost as the chain hits the floor.) As long as the chain slides freely, all you need to worry about is the change in PE and the work done by friction.



I haven't learned about this center of mass thing yet, but OlderDan mentioned that, it makes sense. But won't the center of mass change if part of the chain is lying on the floor? Or should I just assume an infinitely high table?
Assume it doesn't touch the floor.
 
Ok, I think I have it, but I am still not sure about this center of mass thing, and the chain on the floor part, if I should do anything about that.

E0 = 3Ug(-1.5) - Integral_0_5(0.4(5-x)Ug) dx

E1 = 8Ugv^2/2 + 8Ug(-4)

Am I right that this assumes a table that is at least as high as the length of the chain?

When I solve this, I get v = 7.42 m/s, which seems reasonable.

Does this seem right?

Dorothy
 
Thanks Doc Al. I see you answered my question about the center of mass and the floor while I was typing.

Thanks!
Dorothy
 
Dorothy Weglend said:
Ok, I think I have it, but I am still not sure about this center of mass thing, and the chain on the floor part, if I should do anything about that.

E0 = 3Ug(-1.5) - Integral_0_5(0.4(5-x)Ug) dx

E1 = 8Ugv^2/2 + 8Ug(-4)
Looks good, except for that typo. (No "g" in the KE term.)

Am I right that this assumes a table that is at least as high as the length of the chain?
Yes.

When I solve this, I get v = 7.42 m/s, which seems reasonable.

Does this seem right?
I didn't check your arithmetic carefully, but it seems OK.
 
  • #10
Thanks again, to both you and OlderDan.

Yes, that was a typo, sorry. Not my day (smile).

Dorothy
 
  • #11
An interesting feature with this type of problem is to determine the least possible length that must hang down in order for the chain to begin sliding.

Let [itex]\mu_{s}[/itex] is the coefficient of maximal static friction, L the total length of the chain, and [itex]x_{min}[/itex] the length of the piece hanging over the corner, [itex]\rho[/itex] the density of the chain and g the acceleration due to gravity.

We must require that the tension in the chain is continuous; if we follow the vertical piece upwards, the tension must support the weight of the hanging part. At the corner then, the tension is: [itex]T=\rho{g}x_{min}[/itex].

Following the horizontal part of the chain to the corner, the tension must balance the frictional force; thus, at the corner, we must have: [itex]T=\mu_{s}g(L-x_{min})[/itex]

Thus, equating these expressions, we get:
[tex]x_{min}=\frac{\mu_{s}L}{1+\mu_{s}}[/tex]

If we are to calculate the final speed v the chain will have when leaving the table in this case, we get:
[tex]v=\frac{\sqrt{gL(1+2\mu_{s}-\mu_{k})}}{1+\mu_{s}}[/tex]
where [itex]\mu_{k}[/itex] is the coefficient of kinetic friction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
114
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K