What is the minimum pushing force required

  • Thread starter Thread starter nns91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Minimum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two boxes, one with a mass of 16 kg and the other with a mass of 88 kg. The setup includes friction between the two boxes, while the surface beneath the 88 kg box is frictionless. The goal is to determine the minimum pushing force required to prevent the 16 kg box from dropping.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of static friction and normal force in the context of the problem. There are attempts to clarify the relationships between forces and coefficients of friction, with some participants questioning the correct application of equations related to static friction.

Discussion Status

The discussion has evolved with participants clarifying their understanding of the problem setup and the relationships between the forces involved. Some participants have expressed agreement with the reasoning presented, while others have sought to clarify their interpretations of the variables and equations used.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the positioning of the boxes and the nature of the forces acting on them, particularly the distinction between the forces of static friction and normal force. Participants are also navigating through the implications of the friction coefficient in their calculations.

nns91
Messages
301
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



So there are 2 boxes: 1 has a mass of 16kg and the other is 88kg. There is friction between 2 boxes, the surface which box 88kg is on is frictionless. Static friction coefficient is 0.38. Box 16kg is not on the surface, it's is push against the 88kg box. What is the minimum pushing force required in order for box 16kg not drop

Homework Equations



F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



So I do F=ma in the y direction which is Fs - mg=0 to find Fs. Then I do in the x direction F-Fn= 0. From Fs I can get Fn by dividing Fs by 0.38.

Did I solve the problem right ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi

It's in the middle of the night for me and I've got high fever but I think you made one single mistake. You should not divide Fs by 0.38 but rather multiply them.

Think of it this way. If you divide Fs by the friction coefficient and the friction coefficient --> 0 that would imply the friction force would --> infinity, and that dos not seem right... :wink:

Hope this helps!

Cheers
 


But Fs = Fn * coefficient of static friction right ? so Fn =Fs[/SUB / 0.38 right ?
 


Hi
I might be confused by your nomenclature. I think you might have mixed up Fs and Fn, though it might be me reading the problem or your solution wrong as well. Anyway, here's how I would solve the problem:

Known:
Mass m1 = 16 kg
COF u = 0.38
acc. g = 9.82 m/s2

Find the friction force FF

Equations
F = mg [1]
u = FF/FN [2]

My calculations:
Force normal to the plane, FN, is found using [1] (FN=m1*g) [3]

[2] is rewritten as FF=u*FN [4]

Using [3] in [4] yields FF=u*m1*g

This gives a numerical value of roughly 60 N

Questions, comments?

Cheers!
 


probably I confused you guys.

The problem is not like that.

The 16 kg is on the left side of the 88kg and kinda pushed against the 88kg but in the air, 16kg box is not on the frictionless surface. We need to find the min F pushing the 16kg box against the other in order for the 16kg not drop. Get it ??
 


I see...
Now I understand the problem and your solution. And now I agree with you and your solution. Sorry for my confusion.

Just for clarification:
The friction force, FF, is linearly dependent on the applied force,FP (P for Push), on the 16kg-box:

FF= u*FP [1]

FN=m16*g [2]

To balance the box you need top satisfy FN = FF [3]

[1] and [2] in [3] gives: m16*g = u*FP [4]

And [4] can be rewritten as FP = (m16*g)/u

Cheers!
 


So I did it right ?

Peace ! It was on my test. I screwed up a lot so at least I did something right.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
20K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K