Force required to negate vertical acceleration with friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving two blocks, one resting on top of the other, with a focus on calculating the minimum force required to hold the upper block against the lower block while considering frictional forces. The context includes concepts from mechanics, specifically relating to forces, friction, and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the forces acting on the blocks, including the normal force and friction. There are attempts to clarify the distinction between the force required to hold the upper block and the applied force on the system. Some participants question the assumptions made regarding the forces acting on each block and the implications of Newton's third law in this scenario.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing insights and clarifying concepts. Some have provided guidance on how to approach the problem, including the importance of free body diagrams and the relationships between forces. There is a recognition of the complexity involved in understanding the interactions between the blocks.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a side question regarding the effect of force on a connected system of masses, which introduces additional considerations about acceleration and force distribution. The discussion also highlights the need for a formal approach to understanding the mechanics involved.

Obliv
Messages
52
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=21016&stc=1&d=1255066014.jpg

Two blocks m (16kg) and M (88kg) are as shown in the figure. If the co-efficient of friction b/w the blocks is 0.38 but the surface beneath the block is frictionless, what is the minimum force required to hold m against M?

Homework Equations


Fnet = ma
Fs = μs*Fa

The Attempt at a Solution


By using this equation for m Fnety = mg - Fs = 0
One can find the force required Freq = (16*9.8) / μs to be 412.63N

From there I have read that because that is the force required on m on M, it is not the required applied force on the system. That comes out to be around ~487N using proportions. How is this part solved formally? Please be as formal as possible because I want to get this concept down fundamentally.
Thank you very much.

(side question regarding the concept of force transferring through a system of mass like this one: Say there was a basketball in space weighing 5kg. If you applied a force of 10N on it alone, it would accelerate at 2m/s2. If the basketball was connected, by a nearly massless rigid rod that extended millions of miles, to a rock weighing 5000kg, and you pushed on the basketball with 10N, would its acceleration ever change or would it be 10N/5005kg from beginning to end?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Obliv said:

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=21016&stc=1&d=1255066014.jpg

Two blocks m (16kg) and M (88kg) are as shown in the figure. If the co-efficient of friction b/w the blocks is 0.38 but the surface beneath the block is frictionless, what is the minimum force required to hold m against M?

Homework Equations


Fnet = ma
Fs = μs*Fa

The Attempt at a Solution


By using this equation for m Fnety = mg - Fs = 0
One can find the force required Freq = (16*9.8) / μs to be 412.63N

From there I have read that because that is the force required on m on M, it is not the required applied force on the system. That comes out to be around ~487N using proportions. How is this part solved formally? Please be as formal as possible because I want to get this concept down fundamentally.
Thank you very much.

(side question regarding the concept of force transferring through a system of mass like this one: Say there was a basketball in space weighing 5kg. If you applied a force of 10N on it alone, it would accelerate at 2m/s2. If the basketball was connected, by a nearly massless rigid rod that extended millions of miles, to a rock weighing 5000kg, and you pushed on the basketball with 10N, would its acceleration ever change or would it be 10N/5005kg from beginning to end?)
It's generally recommended for problems such as this, to sketch an FBD (free body diagram) for each mass (object) involved.

What you have labeled as Fnet y is actually the minimum normal force required, between m and M, so that m doesn't slide down.
 
Well it's also the net force on m in the y-direction is it not? I thought the only forces acting on m are gravity and the static force of friction through the applied force.
FBD I drew quickly. That is what I see visually along with the image. Fa is equal in both FBD's, correct?
 
SammyS said:
What you have labeled as Fnet y is actually the minimum normal force required, between m and M, so that m doesn't slide down.
You mean, what is labelled Freq is the minimum normal force, yes?
Obliv, what is the relationship between the normal force and F? What is the relationship between the normal force and M?
 
What you have missed is the contact force effect on mass M, When you push something it moves. You have to add to that force the required force to make the two objects get the same acceleration.

A great place to understand fcontact is http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/newtlaws/lesson-3/double-trouble
When you push an objects it pushes back with the same force as an attempt to move it (Newton third law). So when you treat each object individually there should be a force acting leftward which in your case you will treat it as N ( Us * N)
So the force overall should be:
F - n = m a

Now after you figure things out you will end up with the answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Obliv
Biker said:
What you have missed is the contact force effect on mass M, When you push something it moves. You have to add to that force the required force to make the two objects get the same acceleration.

A great place to understand fcontact is http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/newtlaws/lesson-3/double-trouble
When you push an objects it pushes back with the same force as an attempt to move it (Newton third law). So when you treat each object individually there should be a force acting leftward which in your case you will treat it as N ( Us * N)
So the force overall should be:
F - n = m a

Now after you figure things out you will end up with the answer.

Thank you for that link. For some reason, Newton's third law did not occur to me.
for m -> Fnet = ma = FA - FC (contact force)
for M -> Fnet = Ma = Fc
for m in y-direction -> Fnet = may = Fs - mg = 0
Fs = μsFC = mg
FC = 412.63

Plugging the value of FC back into the net force equation for M yields a = 4.688m/s2 and using this information
Fnet = (16)(4.688) = FA - 412.63
FA = 487.65N

I finally get it :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K