MHB What is the minimum value of $n$ for a nonnegative polynomial with degree $d$?

  • Thread starter Thread starter melese
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomials
AI Thread Summary
A polynomial with real coefficients that takes only nonnegative values can be expressed as a sum of squares of other polynomials. The discussion centers on determining the minimum integer value of \( n \) for a nonnegative polynomial of degree \( d \). Examples provided indicate that \( n = 2 \) for \( d = 2 \) and \( n = 1 \) for \( d = 0 \). The method involves using linear algebra concepts to construct polynomials that satisfy the conditions. This topic is also linked to Hilbert's seventeenth problem, which addresses similar polynomial representations.
melese
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
(HUN,1979) Prove the following statement: If a polynomial $f(x)$ with real coefficients takes only nonnegative values, then there exists a positive integer $n$ and polynomials $g_1(x),g_2(x),...,g_n(x)$ such that $f(x)=g_1(x)^2+g_2(x)^2+\cdots+g_n(x)^2$.

A related question of my own, but I don't have/know the answer:
If $\deg({f})=d$, then what is the smallest possible value of $n$.
For example: I know that it's $2$, when $d=2$ and $1$ when $d=0$.

መለሰ
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
melese said:
(HUN,1979) Prove the following statement: If a polynomial $f(x)$ with real coefficients takes only nonnegative values, then there exists a positive integer $n$ and polynomials $g_1(x),g_2(x),...,g_n(x)$ such that $f(x)=g_1(x)^2+g_2(x)^2+\cdots+g_n(x)^2$.

A related question of my own, but I don't have/know the answer:
If $\deg({f})=d$, then what is the smallest possible value of $n$.
For example: I know that it's $2$, when $d=2$ and $1$ when $d=0$.

መለሰ

I thought of this in terms of linear algebra and vector spaces. Consider the set

\begin{matrix}
g_0(x)=\sqrt{c_0} & g_0^2(x)=c_0 \\
g_1(x)=(1+c_1x) & g_1^2(x)=1+2c_1x+c_1^2x^2\\
g_2(x)=\sqrt{c_2}x & g_2(x)=c_1x^2\\
g_3(x)=(x+\sqrt{c_3}x^2) & g_3(x)=x^2+c_3x^3+c_3^2x^4\\
g_4(x)=\sqrt{c_4}x^2) & g_4(x)=c_4x^4 \\
g_5(x)=(x^2+\sqrt{c_5}x^3 & g_5(x)=x^4+c_5x^5+c_5^2x^6 \\
\vdots & \vdots \\
\end{matrix}

This gives a matrix that looks like this

\begin{bmatrix}
c_0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \dots \\
1 & 2c_1 & c_1^2 &0 & 0 & \dots \\
0 & 0 & c_2 & 0 & 0 & \dots \\
0 & 0& 1 & 2c_3 & c_3^2 & \dots \\
\vdots &\vdots &\vdots &\vdots &\vdots & \ddots \\
\end{bmatrix}

As long as the number of rows $$ k$$ is odd the set will be linearly independant and thus span polynomial space of degree $$k-1$$

Just to be clear now we can pick [math]c_0,c_1,c_2,...[/math] so that we can get any polynomail

For example if $$f(x)=3x^2-8x+10$$, then

We solve
\begin{matrix}

c_0+1=10 \\
2c_1=-8 \\
c_1^2+c_2=3
\end{matrix}

This gives
$$c_0=9, \quad c_1=-4, \quad c_2=-13$$

and $$9g_0^2-4g_1^2-13g_2=9+1+2(-4)x+(-4)^2x-13x^2=3x^2-8x+10$$

I think this will help settle your other question as well.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top