What is the nature of the origin of reciprocal space, please?

wangasu
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hi, all

I got a question about the origin of reciprocal space..what is the physical nature of the special point? Does that originate from diffraction? or Is that a diffraction points? We know that a 'normal' reciprocal point designates a group of parallel plane. How about the origin of reciprocal space?

In a powder diffraction, we observed only ONE origin of reciprocal space from a huge number of small single crystals. By contrast, the other points which correspond to a CERTAIN plane form a sphere surrunding the origin of reciprocal space..Why does all the origin of reciprocal space for all the single crystal in the power sample come into one point? What factors determine the location of the special point? Is that associated with the direction of the incident beam? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your concepts seem a bit convoluted. The reciprocal space is a mathematical construct. There is a connection between its origin and a plane wave of zero frequency (i.e. a constant) In diffraction the incident light can only change its k vector by the value of a point on the reciprocal lattice. If that is the origin, the light's direction doesn't change and it goes straight through. The reciprocal lattice is a set of points from the reciprocal space.
 
Thanks Ox..It sounds that it is true that the origin of reciprocal space comes from diffraction, and the diffraction holds the same direction as the incident light with diffraction vector being zero. So, the origin can be easily located as the head of an incident wave vector in Ewald’s sphere. Here is one more question. In practice, the origin of electron diffraction patterns is always a bright spot, can we say it concerns both transmission and diffraction? Thanks.

0xDEADBEEF said:
Your concepts seem a bit convoluted. The reciprocal space is a mathematical construct. There is a connection between its origin and a plane wave of zero frequency (i.e. a constant) In diffraction the incident light can only change its k vector by the value of a point on the reciprocal lattice. If that is the origin, the light's direction doesn't change and it goes straight through. The reciprocal lattice is a set of points from the reciprocal space.
 
Hi,
reciprocal lattice are often seen in transmission electron microscopy. Just look at the web for the two modes of operation (transmission and diffraction mode)..In fact both are same (both images you get after the electron passes the crystal sample)..but one changes the plane to view whether the DP or Image. In a diffraction pattern (may be you know it- bright dots) the distance between point are given in inverse units (like 1/cm, or 1/nm, etc)...But if you take a image..scale will be like 1 cm=1 nm.
Little bit helps you.
 
Right..an electron diffraction image of TEM is the projection of the crossection between the reciprocal lattice points and Ewald's sphere. it seems that the origin of the electron diffraction image definitely explains both transmission AND diffraction, NOT just transmission..does it make sense?
 
But don't forget..in TEM for getting diffraction or image, the electron is transmitted through sample. THatz why transmission electron microscopy.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top