What is the nature of wire tension in a physical system?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter psyhprog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nature Tension Wire
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of wire tension in physical systems, particularly in the context of classical Newtonian mechanics. Participants explore concepts of tension, equilibrium, and the forces acting on objects suspended by strings or wires, addressing both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that wires in classical mechanics are inextensible and unbreakable, leading to confusion about the nature of tension when opposing forces act on the ends of the wire.
  • One participant questions the phrase "tension in both senses," seeking clarification on its meaning.
  • A participant describes a scenario where an object of mass m is suspended by a string, discussing the gravitational force and the opposing force that keeps the system in equilibrium.
  • Another participant explains that in equilibrium, the forces at the point where the mass meets the string must sum to zero, leading to a tension force equal to the weight of the object.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of using multiple strings and how the total tension would be greater than the weight due to lateral components of the forces.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between normal forces and tension, suggesting the use of vector diagrams to analyze the forces acting on the system.
  • Another participant highlights the necessity of considering free body diagrams to clarify which forces act on which bodies and how they relate to tension as an internal force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of equilibrium and the forces acting on the system, but there are varying interpretations of tension and its role in the context of external and internal forces. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise nature of tension and its representation in different scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the potential misunderstanding of terms like "tension in both senses," the dependence on specific definitions of forces, and the need for clarity in the application of free body diagrams. The discussion does not resolve these ambiguities.

psyhprog
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
As far as I understand, the wires in classical Newtonian mechanics are inextensible, unbreakable and so forth. The part that confuses me is that sometimes there are two tensions in the wire, or rather the tension is in both senses. Is that because there are opposing forces acting on the two ends of the wire, or is that simply because of the electrostatic nature of the force (the particles in the wire all attract each other and resist the extension of the wire).

And in more general terms, how to figure out the tension/tensions of the wire, and the way they act or balance a physical system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you for the link, it's useful, and helped clarified things a bit.

What I meant was: consider the following situation: an object of mass m is suspended by an ideal string. So then there's the gravitational force, G = mg pulling the object down, which is transmitted through the string, and it's a force pointing downwards. But the system is in equilibrium, so there's an opposing force equal to the weight created by the support. So that force is equal in modulus but pointing upwards, and is transmitted through the string to the object so that the object is at rest.

Ok so far? And if so, wouldn't "the tension in the string be oriented in both senses"? (one down for the weight, one up for the balancing). And wouldn't it be equal in magnitude to 2 times the weight?
 
I think I'm beginning to see where you are coming from.

Think about the mass being supported by a single string, straight up (or down). It is in equilibrium (ie, not moving). At the point where the mass meets the string the forces on that point sum to zero. The mass provides mg Newtons of force stright down, so to hold this in equilibrium the string provides mg Newtons of tension straight up. If instead the mass is supported by two strings, each at some angle to the mass, the total tension (by which I mean the sum of the tensions in each wire) will be greater than mg Newtons, as there is now a lateral component of the forces at the point where the strings meet the mass.

Does that make it any clearer?
 
Last edited:
Yes it does. What you're saying is that in an system in equilibrium, every point is at equilibrium, and so for certain points like the one where the mass meets the string, there is a "tension force" to account for the equilibrium. When in fact, the "tension force", is simply the normal, directed through the string.
 
I agree, except the 'normal' is a specific vector at 90 degrees to a plane. These problems are usually solved by using vector diagrams and breaking each force vector (mg and the tension in the wires) into their xy components (although the choice of co-ordinate system is entirely yours) to ensure that the vector forces acting on the mass/string junction sum to zero.
 
I think I understand it now, thanks.
 
It is important to be clear which force acts on which body.

We mentally separate the system into "free bodies" and consider the force(s) that must be applied to each free body to hold it in equilibrium.

So in your weight on string case we have two free bodies : the weight and the string.

The weight has two forces acting on it ;
The body force of gravity = weight = mass times g, acting downwards
The pull (from the string) acting upwards on the point of attachment.

Since the weight is in equilibrium these forces are equal.

Notice there is no string in this free body.

The string also has two forces acting on it;

The upwards reaction at whatever you have hung it from.
The downwards pull of the weight on the string.

Again these are in equilibrium and so are equal.

Notice that I have not mentioned tension.

This is because all the above forces are external forces.

That is they are imposed on the free body (string or weight) and can be changed by some external agent, they are not under the control of the free body.

The tension in the string is an internal force or response to the external loading force to enable it to transfer it from one end of the string to the other.

It helps greatly to draw these free body force diagrams. Can you do this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K