Keith_McClary
- 752
- 1,506
They are probably spending their money on cheap calories.Jarvis323 said:impracticality of lettuce as a gift to starving people
They are probably spending their money on cheap calories.Jarvis323 said:impracticality of lettuce as a gift to starving people
True. I realize it is s nice gift. But I'm not about to start a fight famine with lettuce action group or anything.Keith_McClary said:They are probably spending their money on cheap calories.
And they will likely not have refrigerators to keep it fresh, edible.Jarvis323 said:True. I realize it is s nice gift. But I'm not about to start a fight famine with lettuce action group or anything.
Who gets to figure out how much is owed?WWGD said:They don't pay me enough
Preagreed upon baby-sitting, er, tutoring fees. Edit: Sorry for being snippy.Keith_McClary said:Who gets to figure out how much is owed?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_NationalsWWGD said:Montreal Expos
Thanks. I thought you were our designated Canadian.Keith_McClary said:
ButThe IPO of crypto exchange Coinbase on Wednesday has captivated fans of digital currency and investors as they speculate on the potential for a $100 billion valuation on the company.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/coin...ion-not-100-billion-strategist-155726412.html"I think it's [Coinbase] worth closer to $5 billion or $10 billion as opposed to $100 billion," New Constructs CEO David Trainer tells Yahoo Finance.
Weir(d as ) anything I've heard.Borg said:That seems strange.![]()
Well, average person today lives much better by most standards than at any point in time: Life expectancy, Education, Fewer wars, less violence. Still a lot to do , but maybe a self-pat in the back would not be such a bad idea.fresh_42 said:I'm rarely proud of my country or any other. Too many things that do not go well - anywhere. But today was one of these rare moments as I checked the law that prioritizes SARS2-Covid-19 vaccinations. They really tried to adjust the list to vulnerability and besides the oldest, there were e.g. people with trisomy or BMI above 40 in the top-level group.
There are browser extensions and Windows (or other OS) apps that can change the color and shape.WWGD said:changing the color of the cursor
Thank you. Dynamically, i.e., depending on the setup of the page being browsed? Edit: Meaning, e.g., a cursor will be colored black for a page with a white background and viceversa?Keith_McClary said:There are browser extensions and Windows (or other OS) apps that can change the color and shape.
I keep getting ED promos, tooth decay repair and offers to help me finish my high school degree.fresh_42 said:I like the new world. My MS email account thinks I'm Swedish after years taking me for Spanish, my AOL account thinks I'm a republican living in Iowa, FB thinks I'm an American abroad, and probably has denounced me already at the IRS, and only Google leaves me alone. Isn't that funny? Google? They only try to figure out which music I like most, desperately and in vain. If you can't convince them, confuse them.
I haven't checked what they advertise. Especially the Swedish ads are a bit wild. AOL is easy to explain. It all started with the Obama campaign when I clicked through a few emails (from either side) just to see how they run their campaigns. Senator Ernst is doing her best to keep me republican ever since (Rep. Duckworth (D) has given up on me). I once signed in on a dating site (more than 20 years ago) and I still get "offers" from them and surprisingly some other clearly dubious sites.WWGD said:I keep getting ED promos, tooth decay repair and offers to help me finish my high school degree.
I make it a point to have non-gmail accounts because it seems google is good at integrating all your online ( and, worse, otherwise) history.fresh_42 said:I haven't checked what they advertise. Especially the Swedish ads are a bit wild. AOL is easy to explain. It all started with the Obama campaign when I clicked through a few emails (from either side) just to see how they run their campaigns. Senator Ernst is doing her best to keep me republican ever since (Rep. Duckworth (D) has given up on me). I once signed in on a dating site (more than 20 years ago) and I still get "offers" from them and surprisingly some other clearly dubious sites.
I think it's a Don Quijote fight against windmills. Most immediate is FB in their responses to my surf habits. My gmail account is practically free from any spam. I regularly delete my google history, so it's merely youtube which tries to guess my taste. Well, they offer Springsteen and Chuck Berry, so nothing wrong with it.WWGD said:I make it a point to have non-gmail accounts because it seems google is good at integrating all your online ( and, worse, otherwise) history.
That's why/how laziness can be helpful. Just use x-x=0.mathwonk said:As a student, (at Harvard no less), when asked to show the sum of two irrationals is not nec. irrational, I started from a non - repeating decimal, like .141592653589793..., then created another decimal, also non - repeating, say .858407346410206..., whose decimals added to 9 with each decimal I started with. It finally dawned on me, that starting from an irrational x, I had created the irrational number 1-x. Only afterwards did I think of just using -x. And I was in the "honors" class! So I empathize to some extent with your student on this problem.
You tube has offered me just about every type of music; a few times even things I liked.fresh_42 said:I think it's a Don Quijote fight against windmills. Most immediate is FB in their responses to my surf habits. My gmail account is practically free from any spam. I regularly delete my google history, so it's merely youtube which tries to guess my taste. Well, they offer Springsteen and Chuck Berry, so nothing wrong with it.
I remember an exam when the student was asked about linear functions. She perfectly repeated the definition, but when asked to give an example, she struggled. I remember that I thought: "0." - "Do you know a nontrivial one?" - "1." However, I wasn't asked.mathwonk said:As a student, (at Harvard no less), when asked to show the sum of two irrationals is not nec. irrational, I started from a non - repeating decimal, like .141592653589793..., then created another decimal, also non - repeating, say .858407346410206..., whose decimals added to 9 with each decimal I started with. It finally dawned on me, that starting from an irrational x, I had created the irrational number 1-x. Only afterwards did I think of just using -x. And I was in the "honors" class! So I empathize to some extent with your student on this problem.
Good luck with that. I got so confused ; my students too, trying to explain the difference between a linear and an affine function.fresh_42 said:I remember an exam when the student was asked about linear functions. She perfectly repeated the definition, but when asked to give an example, she struggled. I remember that I thought: "0." - "Do you know a nontrivial one?" - "1." However, I wasn't asked.
Infinite dimensions? Isn't that functional analysis?mathwonk said:When I took linear algebra it was all abstract, sort of like in Artin's Geometric algebra, and often in infinite dimensions. When I finally taught it, I was amazed that if you use matrices, in finite dimensions you can actually calculate most of that stuff!
I remember seeing the example of a discontinuous( unbounded) linear map.mathwonk said:I guess so, it was calculus according to Lynn Loomis, on Banach spaces. We learned that the derivative of f at p is a bounded linear map T such that the map f(x+p)-f(p) - T(x) is "little-oh" in the sense that its norm, divided by the norm of x, goes to zero with x. is that right? most of the class members were freshmen, but not me. the unoffical text was Dieudonne's Foundations of modern analysis.
I understood it a bit differently. The norm of the operator is the sup over the unit ball. We normalize a countable subset of the basis so that ||e_i||=1 . Then we declare T(e_i)=i (Standard norm on the Reals/Image), so that the Sup of the images goes to ## \infty ##. But I like your way too, to have more than one approach to see it be more understandable.mathwonk said:me too, maybe if e1,e2,... is an infinite sequence of unit length independent vectors, and T(ej) = j, then although ej/j-->0, T(ej/j) = 1, for all j.
(It seems I still know Banach spaces better than I know trig and one vbl calc.)
My conclusion was that since, given how I was taught, I did not understand anything, if one wants to understand, one should be taught the opposite to how I was. Of course that also may not be sufficient. Maybe it was actually my fault that I did not think and work hard enough, ask questions, look for examples? Nahhh...
I think they probably enjoy the opportunity to sing along. I knew a dog who would start the moment he saw a violin case being opened, even before playing started. He definitely hated being shut out of the room.WWGD said:I hear constant wailing by dogs every time they hear firemen alarms. Wonder if something could be done about it. I am not a crazy Peta person but they seem to go through a bad time.
https://www.umrechnung.org/weltbevoelkerung-aktuelle-momentane/weltbevoelkerungs-zaehler.htmWWGD said:More on absurdly accurate (human) population counts:
The population of Mexico is 130,009,263...wait! , I was just notified 2 people just died and 4 were born. Make that 130,009,265. Why don't they just tell you130 million, or at least 130,009,000?
I get that, but that is a counter intended to be accurate. I am talking about almanacs and websites like Worldometer Corona who use these ultra-accurate counts.fresh_42 said:
Thank you. I am not sure I understood your reply well. Say I have names in the order A,C,B and their corresponding last names in the order D , F,E. (Meaning full names are A+D, C+F, B+E) Can I sort , while keeping the match between names and last names, so that we end up with names column in the order A,B,C and last names in the order D,F,E ? ,i.e., the match between names and last names is preserved? Sorry if I misunderstood you.Ibix said:Not without VBA, as far as I know. You can sort multiple columns in the sense that you could have a surname column and first name column and sort the table by surname then first name (i.e., Smith, Jane comes before Smith, John but after Jones, John), but not both columns independently (i.e. so that Jane comes before both Johns and Jones comes before both Smiths).