- 20,648
- 27,829
WWGD said:Thanks. Just wanted here to have the 8,000th/nd post.

WWGD said:Thanks. Just wanted here to have the 8,000th/nd post.
The first move was within the rules. I deleted my own comment within the time window.WWGD said:Danke schon
I think there is a liberal conspiracy at work.fresh_42 said:The first move was within the rules. I deleted my own comment within the time window.
Now I abused my mentor power to restore the original posts.![]()
fresh_42 said:Do you have a wave count in the US? I wonder whether it is the same as here. This would indicate a correlation of stupidity.
Hmm, same here. I thought it was correlated, although I do not have an explanation. Is it due to the underlying SIR model, or due to the same negligence in dealing with the situation? Probably both.BillTre said:I think normal people would say it is wave #4.
However, I think of the second wave as a continuation of the first wave. It just took a while for the first wave of infection to spread to more rural, regions.
Long ago I worked with a man whose parents had immigrated to the US from China. They came here when Harry Truman was President, to whom they were very grateful. So Mr and Mrs Dong decided to name their first son Harry, in honor of Truman. True story.WWGD said:If your last name is Knapp, don't call your daughter Ivanna.
And they ultimately got married. And Ivana Dong is a happy woman.Ivan Seeking said:Long ago I worked with a man whose parents had immigrated to the US from China. They came here when Harry Truman was President, to whom they were very grateful. So Mr and Mrs Dong decided to name their first son Harry, in honor of Truman. True story.
Yes, SIR!fresh_42 said:Hmm, same here. I thought it was correlated, although I do not have an explanation. Is it due to the underlying SIR model, or due to the same negligence in dealing with the situation? Probably both.
Don't believe that, those color lines in maps don't exist in reality. Believe me, I 've searched.Ivan Seeking said:Mainly in red states. Note for example below, US, Florida, California [twice the population of Florida]
View attachment 288633
View attachment 288634
View attachment 288635
You have to look from space. It's like the Nazca lines.WWGD said:Don't believe that, those color lines in maps don't exist in reality. Believe me, I 've searched.
No, careful, cars at that speed will kill you. But strange pronounciation. Reminds me of the guy who had a lisp only in writing. And now they drive on a track, not in the Peruvian(?) desert.Ivan Seeking said:You have to look from space. It's like the Nazca lines.
Not with an astronaut driving!WWGD said:No, careful, cars at that speed will kill you.
But, doesn't tutoring improve kids' educational success/foundation, which can lead to higher earnings and greater productivity later in life...which would presumably, in turn, help them afford to have a bigger family later down the line?SHANGHAI (Reuters) -China on Wednesday banned private tutors from giving classes online or in unregistered venues such as residential buildings, hotels and coffee shops, ramping up its effort to stamp out all for-profit tutoring.
Authorities this year banned for-profit tutoring in subjects on the school curriculum in an effort to ease pressure on children and parents.
A competitive higher education system has made tutoring services popular with parents but the government has sought to reduce the cost of child-rearing in an effort to nudge up a lagging birthrate.
Then again these are the same people who prohibited images of Winnie the Pooh, so all bets are off.kyphysics said:https://finance.yahoo.com/news/china-says-private-tutors-not-075010233.html
But, doesn't tutoring improve kids' educational success/foundation, which can lead to higher earnings and greater productivity later in life...which would presumably, in turn, help them afford to have a bigger family later down the line?
What about the tutors' ability to earn an income for themselves (which can affect their ability to have children too)?
Reason number 47 to trust the free-market over central planning.kyphysics said:But, doesn't ...
Comme on, don't you think it deserves to be tried again? Some 100 failures are not enough to tell if it works \ Sarcgmax137 said:Reason number 47 to trust the free-market over central planning.
Or it could be gaming the system to get rich kids into prestige schools.kyphysics said:But, doesn't tutoring improve kids' educational success/foundation, which can lead to higher earnings and greater productivity later in life.
It's difficult to gauge the full impact but at least in market economies fortunes tend to disappear after 3 generations, so the problem sort of takes care of itself.Keith_McClary said:Or it could be gaming the system to get rich kids into prestige schools.
The Economist (8/21/21) said:Economists tend to be big fans of education, which is perhaps not surprising given how much of it they consume and how well their textbooks can do. Alfred Marshall, writing in 1873, hoped that education would help erase the “distinction between working men and gentlemen”. Gary Becker of the University of Chicago reimagined education as an investment in “human capital” that would earn a return in the market much like other assets. Harvard University’s Greg Mankiw, whose books have educated more than most, once calculated that differences in human capital between countries could account for much of their otherwise inexplicable differences in prosperity.
But economics can also be scathing about schooling. The theory of signalling likens many educational credentials to peacock’s tails: costly encumbrances, useful only as conspicuous proof that their owners are intellectually strong enough to bear them. And in “The Social Limits to Growth”, a book published in 1976, Fred Hirsch, once a writer for this newspaper, pointed out that education is often “positional” in nature. What matters is not only how much you have, but whether you have more than the next person. For many students it is not enough merely to acquire a good education. They must obtain a better education than the people jostling with them in the queue for sought-after jobs.
Positional goods are, by their nature, in strictly limited supply. Everyone can in principle live in a good neighbourhood, attend a good school, and work in a good job. But logic sadly dictates that not everyone can enjoy the nicest neighbourhoods, best schools or most prestigious jobs. As Hirsch pointed out, “what each of us can achieve, all cannot.”
An unhappy corollary is that one family’s outlays on schooling raise the bar for everyone else. Families are drawn, often unwittingly, into educational arms races. They spend money and time on after-school tutoring or extra-curricular activities (so-called shadow education) in the expectation that it will improve their child’s position in the queue for advancement. But they quickly discover that everyone else is doing the same, leaving them in the same position as before. They are in fact worse off, because of the costs and frustration incurred. “If everyone stands on tiptoe, no one sees better,” Hirsch noted. And their feet also hurt.
These arms races are often particularly ferocious in East Asia. In China and South Korea, schoolchildren face nationwide “high-stakes” tests—the gaokao in China and the suneung in South Korea—that play a big role in determining whether and where they can go to university. In China’s cities, pupils spent 10.6 hours a week on after-school tutoring, according to a report by Frost & Sullivan, a market-research firm.
…
The arms race is notably less intense in parts of Europe. In Norway and Sweden parents show little demand for tutoring—the wealthy even less than others, according to Steve Entrich of the University of Potsdam. And overeducation is less common in Germany and other countries that sort children early into academic or vocational schools, with little mobility between the two, according to a study by Valentina Di Stasio of Utrecht University together with Thijs Bol and Herman Van de Werfhorst of the University of Amsterdam. Vocational schools are supposed to teach what employers want recruits to know. That may limit the scope for credential inflation. For better or worse, they also remove large numbers of students from the race for more academic laurels…
Yeah, I've read that there are a couple of known Hollywood stars who've pretty much given up bathing because of some kind of fad out there that says it's not healthy. These are GUYS of course. I think women prefer not to stink.WWGD said:New fad: Not wearing deodorant. Claim is that armpits smell only because deodorant has killed local ( armpit) biome so that it does not function well. Some have extended it to showering. Dubious.
I imagine these are actors that have already made it. Matt McConeghy( Sp?) is one of them.phinds said:Yeah, I've read that there are a couple of known Hollywood stars who've pretty much given up bathing because of some kind of fad out there that says it's not healthy. These are GUYS of course. I think women prefer not to stink.
I think he bathes, he just doesn't use deodorant.WWGD said:I imagine these are actors that have already made it. Matt McConeghy( Sp?) is one of them.
His name/reputation ( and smell) precede them. Aka, he needs no introduction. Just open your nose a bit. And then close it.phinds said:I think he bathes, he just doesn't use deodorant.
Yes, it is bizarre to first use soap to make yourself clean, which kills smell of pheromones, then using cologne, perfume to restore them.fresh_42 said:Y'all may turn up your nose, but smells good comes to a price that shouldn't be disregarded! It interrupts essential biological processes like finding a suited partner or identifying ovulation.
A fad ripe with opportunity.WWGD said:New fad: Not wearing deodorant. Claim is that armpits smell only because deodorant has killed local ( armpit) biome so that it does not function well. Some have extended it to showering. Dubious.
Hope you didn't need a peacemaker.Ivan Seeking said:Being a peacemaker is boring. I don't even get to use my evil laugh.
I was the peacemaker. It was so out of character for me. Not nearly as much fun as trolling at PF.fresh_42 said:Hope you didn't need a peacemaker.
I had (have?) a news feed from an Australian pop science site on FB. There was a time when they regularly had medical subjects. What shall I say? It makes fun to annoy anti-vaxxers.Ivan Seeking said:I was the peacemaker. It was so out of character for me. Not nearly as much fun as trolling at PF.
One time when I was about 55 I went to a relationships forum to whine about the trials and tribulations of having a hot 26 yo girlfriend. What I didn't realize was that it was run by a bunch of very religious and highly conservative people. LOL! Ooops. They came swarming down on me like flying monkeys from the land of Oz.fresh_42 said:I had (have?) a news feed from an Australian pop science site on FB. There was a time when they regularly had medical subjects. What shall I say? It makes fun to annoy anti-vaxxers.
OK. Let's see the proof.WWGD said:There are possible worlds where possible worlds don't exist.
You live in the world where such proof is impossible, unfortunately.Tom.G said:OK. Let's see the proof.
So in that world, this is not a possible world. Therefore we do not exist.WWGD said:There are possible worlds where possible worlds don't exist.
Attn Kurt Godel.Ivan Seeking said:So in that world, this is not a possible world. Therefore we do not exist.
No...wait...
Is that a measured number or based off the number of hours televised?Ivan Seeking said:Over the course of the TV series House, they shot over 4000 miles of film.
I don't know. But they specified 4076 miles.caz said:Is that a measured number or based off the number of hours televised?