What is the newest installment of 'Random Thoughts' on Physics Forums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random Thoughts
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses various random thoughts and observations, touching on topics such as media programming, personal anecdotes, language use, and mathematical curiosities. The scope includes informal commentary, humor, and reflections on everyday experiences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express frustration with the quality of documentaries on channels like the History Channel and National Geographic, suggesting a decline in factual programming.
  • There is a humorous anecdote about discovering a polythene bag obstructing a kitchen extractor fan, leading to a discussion about the clarity of installation manuals.
  • Participants share thoughts on the nature of prime numbers, particularly regarding the status of the number 2 and its implications for mathematical proofs.
  • There are reflections on language use and the reactions to grammatical errors made by native speakers, with some participants sharing their personal responses to such situations.
  • One participant humorously suggests that if 2 were not considered prime, it would complicate the understanding of prime factors in even numbers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views, particularly regarding the status of the number 2 as a prime and the quality of media programming. No consensus is reached on these topics.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying degrees of skepticism and humor, with some comments reflecting personal experiences and subjective opinions rather than objective analysis.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in informal discussions about media, language, and mathematics may find this thread engaging.

  • #4,771
Coincide: Killing of a coin?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #4,772
Feel like pounding someone when I use email setup in such a way that unless one is very careful, one may self-send an email. Who designed this?
 
  • #4,773
WWGD said:
Feel like pounding someone when I use email setup in such a way that unless one is very careful, one may self-send an email. Who designed this?
This is the standard: all recipients listed will be served. To avoid this would mean an extra routine which checks the list. And some might want to self send an email. It's a convenient way to write a reminder. Plus that such plausibility checks increase the error probability and tend to grow like a cancer over the years.
 
  • #4,774
fresh_42 said:
This is the standard: all recipients listed will be served. To avoid this would mean an extra routine which checks the list. And some might want to self send an email. It's a convenient way to write a reminder. Plus that such plausibility checks increase the error probability and tend to grow like a cancer over the years.
But I never include myself as a recipient. And the only one who ends up as a recipient is myself. This is what I have trouble with; not that I am a recipient but that none of the other 'non-me' original recipients are included in the reply.

Original Message
To: Recipient1, Recipient2,..., Recipientm

[Message Body]

Reply
To: Myself. Only, none of the recipients in original message included.
 
  • #4,775
WWGD said:
Feel like pounding someone when I use email setup in such a way that unless one is very careful, one may self-send an email. Who designed this?

Perhaps your email handler program on your device(s) or your email subscription service (gmail, hotmail, etc.) has a configurable switch (option) to inhibit automatic self-send.

My email config: While I compose an email a copy appears in a draft sub-folder. When sent, the copy moves to sent sub-folder. Unless I explicitly place my email address in one of the To: Cc: blocks, I do not receive another copy. Best guess: see if the backup copy Bcc: includes your address.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
  • #4,776
Klystron said:
Perhaps your email handler program on your device(s) or your email subscription service (gmail, hotmail, etc.) has a configurable switch (option) to inhibit automatic self-send.

My email config: While I compose an email a copy appears in a draft sub-folder. When sent, the copy moves to sent sub-folder. Unless I explicitly place my email address in one of the To: Cc: blocks, I do not receive another copy. Best guess: see if the backup copy Bcc: includes your address.
Thank you. I think I phrased things confusingly: I am the only recipient of the reply despite not including myself as a recipient., none of the recipients of the original is a default recipient for the reply. Yes, I will have to check the settings, but these seem to be default settings since I don't remember choosing them at any point.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
  • #4,777
WWGD said:
Thank you. I think I phrased things confusingly: I am the only recipient of the reply despite not including myself as a recipient., none of the recipients of the original is a default recipient for the reply. Yes, I will have to check the settings, but these seem to be default settings since I don't remember choosing them at any point.
Are you using the "Reply" command or the "Reply All" command? "Reply" shouldn't go to any of the original recipients, it should go to the original sender.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
  • #4,778
If one could jump back in time; I would first learn colloquial German, jump back to 19xx, and warn Erwin Schrödinger
"Dude, no animal examples in physics. No cats or bats, no mice or lice." .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
  • #4,779
Klystron said:
If one could jump back in time; I would first learn colloquial German, jump back to 19xx, and warn Erwin Schrödinger
"Dude, no animal examples in physics. No cats or bats, no mice or lice." .
Yes, why choose a cat ? Maybe cat is in the right Cat[] (category, or cat-egory)?
 
  • #4,780
While we are at it, in case someone already knows the answer to this, I can look it up otherwise, but I have to dreg through all the trash and irrelevant results:

If I move email E into folder F, will any follow up email sent to me automatically land in F? Or will it land in my 'regular' inbox? Please reply only if you know it right away. EDIT: Never mind, I figured it out. Yes, for Yahoo.
 
Last edited:
  • #4,781
No, there is no Gym (Jim) in the building but there is a James in 2B.
 
  • #4,782
No, that was a coffee stain in the paper. Chichen Itza(Sp?), not Chicken Pizza.
 
  • #4,783
PF is cool!

I started a small talk with a lady in front of me at the grocery store as she tried to help me putting things on the belt. She seemingly didn't understand me or whatever, but she replied in English. Thanks PF, I had not the least difficulty to instantaneously switch language. And British are so polite! She didn't even raised her eyebrow as I - what I realized later - answered in my American colored English and said "eather" instead of "ither", not to mention the melody of my sentences.
 
  • #4,784
fresh_42 said:
She didn't even raised her eyebrow as I - what I realized later - answered in my American colored English and said "eather" instead of "ither", not to mention the melody of my sentences.
In Britain we've seen so many American films and TV programmes that we can (usually) cope with American accents without any problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
  • #4,785
fresh_42 said:
PF is cool!

I started a small talk with a lady in front of me at the grocery store as she tried to help me putting things on the belt. She seemingly didn't understand me or whatever, but she replied in English. Thanks PF, I had not the least difficulty to instantaneously switch language. And British are so polite! She didn't even raised her eyebrow as I - what I realized later - answered in my American colored English and said "eather" instead of "ither", not to mention the melody of my sentences.
Eather instead of ither. Did you also say poteito or potato? Tomeito/Tomato? But, by your own account , you did not call the whole thing off, it seems.
 
  • #4,786
WWGD said:
Eather instead of ither. Did you also say poteito or potato? Tomeito/Tomato? But, by your own account , you did not call the whole thing off, it seems.
I've forgotten to buy tomatoes and she wasn't interested in my potatoes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
  • #4,787
fresh_42 said:
And She didn't even raised her eyebrow as I - what I realized later - answered in my American colored English and said "eather" instead of "ither", not to mention the melody of my sentences.
Much more importantly than any UK/US divide, how do you pronounce grass? With a short a like acid or long a like arsenic?
 
  • #4,788
fresh_42 said:
PF is cool!

I started a small talk with a lady in front of me at the grocery store as she tried to help me putting things on the belt. She seemingly didn't understand me or whatever, but she replied in English. Thanks PF, I had not the least difficulty to instantaneously switch language. And British are so polite! She didn't even raised her eyebrow as I - what I realized later - answered in my American colored English and said "eather" instead of "ither", not to mention the melody of my sentences.
Just say Fahvernugen (most likely wrongly written) next time.Or act out the Sprockets theme from SNL, with the hand movements and dance.
 
  • #4,789
DrGreg said:
In Britain we've seen so many American films and TV programmes that we can (usually) cope with American accents without any problem.
I had difficulty in the past understanding British regional accents and colloquial expressions, then in late 1980's PBS station KTEH began daily broadcasts of East Enders. I would tape 5 segments a week* and binge-watch on the weekends with friends.

After listening to pub-tenders Den and Ang arguing with fruit and veg seller Pete and wife Cath, I could even understand a crime drama set in Glasgow and the young Dennis Potter character (speaking Geordie?) in the series Singing Detective. While this is reminiscent of people 'learning' American English from reruns of Dallas, watching East Enders also helped me understand dialog in Shakespeare's plays.

*BBC originally broadcast two half-hour segments a week as 'soap operas'.
 
  • #4,790
Ibix said:
Much more importantly than any UK/US divide, how do you pronounce grass? With a short a like acid or long a like arsenic?
My sister is a hard core Elvis fan, so I grew up with

But to be honest, I cannot really figure out the difference to

And, yes I know he's not English.
 
  • #4,791
fresh_42 said:
My sister is a hard core Elvis fan, so I grew up with

But to be honest, I cannot really figure out the difference to

And, yes I know he's not English.

Maybe DeGrasse is greener with Neil(Tyson)?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
  • #4,792
WWGD said:
Just say Fahvernugen ...
Guess this should mean joy ride (Fahrvergnügen - close enough!). Thank god I didn't mention anything like this. She has been on a greenish mission ...
 
  • #4,793
fresh_42 said:
Guess this should mean joy ride (Fahrvergnügen - close enough!). Thank god I didn't mention anything like this. She has been on a greenish mission ...
Then try the Sprockets thing. Don't Germans do so anyway, like, daily?

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
  • #4,794
Ibix said:
Much more importantly than any UK/US divide, how do you pronounce grass? With a short a like acid or long a like arsenic?
Short 'a' pronounced like gas.
Mnemonic: the growling dog bit me on my ...backside... Grrr + ass. Oh, wait; that's arse in British slang.
 
  • #4,795
Klystron said:
Short 'a' pronounced like gas.
Mnemonic: the growling dog bit me on my ...backside... Grrr + ass. Oh, wait; that's arse in British slang.
Your Grr +ass has two arse...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
  • #4,796
WWGD said:
Then try the Sprockets thing. Don't Germans do so anyway, like, daily?


Nope. We do this (at 2:25):
 
  • #4,797
fresh_42 said:
Nope. We do this (at 2:25):

Drunk Penguin Danzert?
 
  • #4,798
WWGD said:
Drunk Penguin Danzert?
This was a short (7 episodes) low budget sci-fi series in '66 (Space Patrol Orion); very low budget. They did everything to appear futuristic. The setup of the bridge e.g. included an iron as steering instrument and so on. It's meanwhile a cult and some cinemas (or tv) occasionally show all episodes in one night. But the theme is o.k.:
 
  • #4,799
fresh_42 said:
This was a short (7 episodes) low budget sci-fi series in '66 (Space Patrol Orion); very low budget. They did everything to appear futuristic. The setup of the bridge e.g. included an iron as steering instrument and so on. It's meanwhile a cult and some cinemas (or tv) occasionally show all episodes in one night. But the theme is o.k.:

A worrisome thing about all these futuristic shows is that it seems baldness has not been cured in the future: there are always bald guys staring in the shows.
 
  • #4,800
Kind of paradoxical that changing to a healthier diet (more fruits, vegetables, water, cutting down on artificial additives; cutting down on sugar, etc.) has made me weaker in a way. When I eat something sugary or ladden with preservatives, it hits me way harder than when I was not as healthful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K