MHB What is the Optimality Condition for a Firm's Profit Maximization Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ginnee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition
Ginnee
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If I'm given a firm's production function of

$$Y=zK^{\alpha}{N}^{1-\alpha}$$

Then assuming $$K$$ is fixed and cost free, we can get our profit maximzation problem of

$$\max_{{N}}zF(K^{\alpha}{N}^{1-\alpha})-wN$$

To find the optimality condition, $${MP}_{N}=w$$ , I take the partial derivative and find

$$z{F}_{N}=z(1-\alpha){K}^{\alpha}{N}^{-\alpha}=w$$

Here is where I'm stuck.

I need to show that the optimality condition can be written as $$\alpha=1-\frac{wN}{Y}$$

Any help would be appreciated.

Thank you,

Gin
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ginnee said:
If I'm given a firm's production function of

$$Y=zK^{\alpha}{N}^{1-\alpha}$$

Then assuming $$K$$ is fixed and cost free, we can get our profit maximzation problem of

$$\max_{{N}}zF(K^{\alpha}{N}^{1-\alpha})-wN$$

To find the optimality condition, $${MP}_{N}=w$$ , I take the partial derivative and find

$$z{F}_{N}=z(1-\alpha){K}^{\alpha}{N}^{-\alpha}=w$$

Here is where I'm stuck.

I need to show that the optimality condition can be written as $$\alpha=1-\frac{wN}{Y}$$

Any help would be appreciated.

Thank you,

Gin

Dont get the notation. What is z and F and also F with a subscript N
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top